Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32252375›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Relationship between Mentalizing and Working Conditions in Health Care.

Dagmar Steinmair, Felix Richter, And Henriette Löffler-Stastka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dagmar SteinmairKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Hospital St. Pölten, Dunant-Platz 1, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria.
Felix RichterDepartment of Psychoanalysis und Psychotherapy, and Teaching Center/Postgraduate Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
And Henriette Löffler-StastkaDepartment of Psychoanalysis und Psychotherapy, and Teaching Center/Postgraduate Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mentalizing describes the human ability to comprehend one's own and others' mental states and is seen as one of the core competencies of psychotherapists. Current research has emphasized the importance of both early dyadic attachment as well as broader sociocultural environmental input on the development of mentalizing. This study investigates whether mentalizing skills, operationalized via reflective functioning (RF), might be influenced by training and working conditions. This study was a matched case-control comparison, cross-sectional study. RF was assessed in a total of 10 psychotherapy trainees working in private practice at the beginning (group A;

Indexed as

MentalizationPsychotherapyAdultCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumanshuman-–environmental perspectivePsychotherapy trainingreflective functioningsettingsociodemographicworking conditions

Identifiers

PMID32252375
PMCPMC7178150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.