Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32252349›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2020

Extended Pharmacopeial Characterization of Surfactant Aerosols Generated by a Customized eFlow Neos Nebulizer Delivered through Neonatal Nasal Prongs.

Federico Bianco, Elena Pasini, Marcello Nutini, Xabier Murgia, Carolin Stoeckl, Martin Schlun, Uwe Hetzer, Sauro Bonelli, Marta Lombardini, Ilaria Milesi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Federico BiancoDepartment of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., 43122 Parma, Italy.
Elena PasiniDepartment of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., 43122 Parma, Italy.
Marcello NutiniDepartment of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., 43122 Parma, Italy.
Xabier MurgiaScientific Consultancy, 48640 Bilbao, Spain.
Carolin StoecklPARI Pharma GmbH, 82319 Starnberg, Germany.
Martin SchlunPARI Pharma GmbH, 82319 Starnberg, Germany.
Uwe HetzerPARI Pharma GmbH, 82319 Starnberg, Germany.
Sauro BonelliDepartment of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., 43122 Parma, Italy.
Marta LombardiniDepartment of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., 43122 Parma, Italy.
Ilaria MilesiDepartment of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., 43122 Parma, Italy.
Marisa PertileDepartment of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., 43122 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7736-6009
Stephan MinocchieriDivision of Neonatology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Fabrizio SalomoneDepartment of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., 43122 Parma, Italy.
Albert BucholskiPARI Pharma GmbH, 82319 Starnberg, Germany.
Chiesi Foundation · ITPARI (Germany) · DEKantonsspital Winterthur · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The delivery of nebulized medications to preterm infants during Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) remains an unmet clinical need. In this regard, the effective delivery of nebulized surfactant has been particularly investigated in preclinical and clinical studies. In this work, we investigated the feasibility of delivering nebulized surfactant through various commercially available nasal prong types. We first performed a compendial characterization of surfactant aerosols generated by the eFlow Neos nebulizer, customized to be used in neonates, determining the amount of surfactant delivered by the device as well as the aerodynamic characteristics of surfactant aerosols. Additionally, we extended the compendial characterization by testing the effect of different nasal prong types on the estimated lung dose using a realistic Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) circuit that included a cast of the upper airways of a preterm neonate. The compendial characterization of surfactant aerosols delivered through different nasal prongs achieved relatively high delivered surfactant doses (in the range 63-74% of the nominal dose), with aerodynamic characteristics displaying mass median aerodynamic diameters ranging between 2.52 and 2.81 µm. Nevertheless, when using a representative in vitro setup mimicking NIV in a clinical setting, significant differences were observed in terms of the estimated lung dose accounting for up to two-fold differences (from 10% to 20% estimated lung deposition of the nominal dose) depending on the chosen nasal prong type. Considering that surfactant lung deposition rates are correlated with therapeutic efficacy, this study points out the relevance of choosing the appropriate NIV interface to maximize the lung dose of nebulized medications.

Indexed as

aerosol depositioneFlow nebulizernasal prongsnebulized surfactantnon-invasive ventilation

Identifiers

PMID32252349
PMCPMC7238214
OpenAlexW3014413257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.