ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Applications of Carbon Nanotubes in Bone Regenerative Medicine.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoparticles and Nanomaterials: A Review from the Standpoint of Pharmacy and Medicine.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Bone Defect Treatment in Regenerative Medicine: Exploring Natural and Synthetic Bone Substitutes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Bioinspired Hierarchical Carbon Structures as Potential Scaffolds for Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Clindamycin-Loaded Nanosized Calcium Phosphates Powders as a Carrier of Active Substances.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A non-invasive smart scaffold for bone repair and monitoring.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Electroactive Biomaterials for Facilitating Bone Defect Repair under Pathological Conditions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- A Structural Analysis of Proteinaceous Nanotube Cavities and Their Applications in Nanotechnology.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
- Frame Coating of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Collagen on PET Fibers for Artificial Joint Ligaments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scaffolds are essential for bone regeneration due to their ability to maintain a sustained release of growth factors and to provide a place where cells that form new bone can enter and proliferate. In recent years, scaffolds made of various materials have been developed and evaluated. Functionally effective scaffolds require excellent cell affinity, chemical properties, mechanical properties, and safety. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are fibrous nanoparticles with a nano-size diameter and have excellent strength and chemical stability. In the industrial field, they are used as fillers to improve the performance of materials. Because of their excellent physicochemical properties, CNTs are studied for their promising clinical applications as biomaterials. In this review article, we focused on the results of our research on CNT scaffolds for bone regeneration, introduced the promising properties of scaffolds for bone regeneration, and described the potential of CNT scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.