Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32251452›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The impact of end-demand legislation on sex workers' access to health and sex worker-led services: A community-based prospective cohort study in Canada.

Elena Argento, Shira Goldenberg, Melissa Braschel, Sylvia Machat, Steffanie A Strathdee, Kate Shannon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena ArgentoCentre for Gender & Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Shira GoldenbergCentre for Gender & Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Melissa BraschelCentre for Gender & Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sylvia MachatCentre for Gender & Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Steffanie A StrathdeeDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Kate ShannonCentre for Gender & Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6764-5212
University of British Columbia · CASimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Social and structural context of HIV/STI risk among FSWsR01DA028648 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI GOLDENBERG, SHIRA MIRIAM, KRUSI, ANDREA · 2010 to 2024
$6.9M
Impact of Drug Policy Reform on the HIV Risk Environment among IDUs in TijuanaR37DA019829 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI STRATHDEE, STEFFANIE A. · 2010 to 2019
$6.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA028648NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA019829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing a global wave of end-demand criminalization of sex work, the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act (PCEPA) was implemented in Canada, which has implications for the health and safety of sex workers. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the PCEPA on sex workers' access to health, violence, and sex worker-led services.

methodsLongitudinal data were drawn from a community-based cohort of ~900 cis and trans women sex workers in Vancouver, Canada. Multivariable logistic regression examined the independent effect of the post-PCEPA period (2015-2017) versus the pre-PCEPA period (2010-2013) on time-updated measures of sex workers' access to health, violence supports, and sex worker/community-led services.

resultsThe PCEPA was independently correlated with reduced odds of having access to health services when needed (AOR 0.59; 95%CI: 0.45-0.78) and community-led services (AOR 0.77; 95%CI: 0.62-0.95). Among sex workers who experienced physical violence/sexual violence or trauma, there was no significant difference in access to counseling supports post-PCEPA (AOR 1.24; 95%CI: 0.93-1.64).

conclusionSex workers experienced significantly reduced access to critical health and sex worker/community-led services following implementation of the new laws. Findings suggest end-demand laws may exacerbate and reproduce harms of previous criminalized approaches to sex work in Canada. This study is one of the first globally to evaluate the impact of end-demand approaches to sex work. There is a critical evidence-based need to move away from criminalization of sex work worldwide to ensure full labor and human rights for sex workers. Findings warn against adopting end-demand approaches in other cities or jurisdictions.

Indexed as

AdultCanadaFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleProspective StudiesSex WorkSex WorkersTransgender Persons

Identifiers

PMID32251452
PMCPMC7135091
OpenAlexW3014167875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.