ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2020
Rights, interests and expectations: Indigenous perspectives on unrestricted access to genomic data.
Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
125 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Data Governance in Health Research: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- From equity to solidarity: how care and relationality transform the debate on justice in genomics.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- A primary care pharmacogenetic precision medicine pilot based on specific Māori tribal ethical frameworks and principles.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Cultural, ethical, legal, and social considerations in genomics research with Indigenous Peoples: A scoping review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Characterizing core outcomes of responsible stewardship for human genomic data in the cloud.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Indigenous sovereignty and the limits of the Canadian Precision Health Initiative.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Virtual deliberation on genetics research: report-out of key themes from Diné (Navajo) research & healthcare professionals.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- "If It Don't Talk, It's Not Whakapapa Data": Conceptualising Whakapapa Data in a Digital Age.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026Article
- Evo-devo and the Biodiversity Crisis.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026Article
- Digital death and posthumous data: a glocal, relational perspective.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Article
- Situating genetic counseling research: The role of the sociopolitical climate in research production and interpretation.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Analyzing human gut microbiome data from global populations: challenges and resources.Trends in microbiology · 2025Review
- A Tribal data repository to advance Indigenous health and sovereignty.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Review
- Reflecting on power: the inadequacies of small sample size technique through the lens of Indigenous health.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Trusted partners, community priorities, and data protections: requirements for precision medicine research with Alaska Native peoples.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- The Australian LINEAGE Study: advancing and implementing international guidance on genomic data within local governance frameworks.NPJ genomic medicine · 2025Article
- The accuracy of polygenic score models for BMI and Type II diabetes in the Native Hawaiian population.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Towards an inclusive Open Science: examining EDI and public participation in policy documents across Europe and the Americas.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Addressing Indigenous rights and interests in genetic resources has become increasingly challenging in an open science environment that promotes unrestricted access to genomic data. Although Indigenous experiences with genetic research have been shaped by a series of negative interactions, there is increasing recognition that equitable benefits can only be realized through greater participation of Indigenous communities. Issues of trust, accountability and equity underpin Indigenous critiques of genetic research and the sharing of genomic data. This Perspectives article highlights identified issues for Indigenous communities around the sharing of genomic data and suggests principles and actions that genomic researchers can adopt to recognize community rights and interests in data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32251390What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.