Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32251360›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Effects of daily L-dopa administration on learning and brain structure in older adults undergoing cognitive training: a randomised clinical trial.

Alexander V Lebedev, Jonna Nilsson, Joanna Lindström, William Fredborg, Ulrika Akenine, Carolina Hillilä, Pia Andersen, Gabriela Spulber, Elizabeth C M de Lange, Dirk-Jan van den Berg and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Higher Striatal Dopamine is Related With Lower Physical Performance Fatigability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Spatial and temporal scales of dopamine transmission.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Alexander V LebedevAging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. alexander.lebedev@ki.se.
Jonna NilssonAging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Joanna LindströmAging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
William FredborgAging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ulrika AkenineDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carolina HilliläDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pia AndersenDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gabriela SpulberDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elizabeth C M de LangeLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Division of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Universiteit Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands.
Dirk-Jan van den BergLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Division of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Universiteit Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands.
Miia KivipeltoAging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin LövdénAging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SELeiden University · NLKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive aging creates major individual and societal burden, motivating search for treatment and preventive care strategies. Behavioural interventions can improve cognitive performance in older age, but effects are small. Basic research has implicated dopaminergic signalling in plasticity. We investigated whether supplementation with the dopamine-precursor L-dopa improves effects of cognitive training on performance. Sixty-three participants for this randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were recruited via newspaper advertisements. Inclusion criteria were: age of 65-75 years, Mini-Mental State Examination score >25, absence of serious medical conditions. Eligible subjects were randomly allocated to either receive 100/25 mg L-dopa/benserazide (n = 32) or placebo (n = 31) prior to each of twenty cognitive training sessions administered during a four-week period. Participants and staff were blinded to group assignment. Primary outcomes were latent variables of spatial and verbal fluid intelligence. Compared to the placebo group, subjects receiving L-dopa improved less in spatial intelligence (-0.267 SDs; 95%CI [-0.498, -0.036]; p = 0.024). Change in verbal intelligence did not significantly differ between the groups (-0.081 SDs, 95%CI [-0.242, 0.080]; p = 0.323). Subjects receiving L-dopa also progressed slower through the training and the groups displayed differential volumetric changes in the midbrain. No statistically significant differences were found for the secondary cognitive outcomes. Adverse events occurred for 10 (31%) and 7 (23%) participants in the active and control groups, correspondingly. The results speak against early pharmacological interventions in older healthy adults to improve broader cognitive functions by targeting the dopaminergic system and provide no support for learning-enhancing properties of L-dopa supplements in the healthy elderly. The findings warrant closer investigation about the cognitive effects of early dopamine-replacement therapy in neurological disorders. This trial was preregistered at the European Clinical Trial Registry, EudraCT#2016-000891-54 (2016-10-05).

Indexed as

AgedBody Mass IndexBrainCognitionDopamine AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHomovanillic AcidHumansLearningLevodopaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermPlacebosDopamine AgentsHomovanillic AcidLevodopaPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID32251360
PMCPMC7090037
OpenAlexW3012579949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.