Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32251331›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Probing and predicting ganglion cell responses to smooth electrical stimulation in healthy and blind mouse retina.

Larissa Höfling, Jonathan Oesterle, Philipp Berens, Günther Zeck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sonogenetics in the Treatment of Chronic Diseases: A New Method for Cell Regulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Automatic Identification of Axon Bundle Activation for Epiretinal Prosthesis.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Larissa HöflingNatural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Jonathan OesterleInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Philipp BerensInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0199-4727
Günther ZeckNatural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany. Guenther.Zeck@nmi.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3998-9883
Natural and Medical Sciences Institute · DEBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal implants are used to replace lost photoreceptors in blind patients suffering from retinopathies such as retinitis pigmentosa. Patients wearing implants regain some rudimentary visual function. However, it is severely limited compared to normal vision because non-physiological stimulation strategies fail to selectively activate different retinal pathways at sufficient spatial and temporal resolution. The development of improved stimulation strategies is rendered difficult by the large space of potential stimuli. Here we systematically explore a subspace of potential stimuli by electrically stimulating healthy and blind mouse retina in epiretinal configuration using smooth Gaussian white noise delivered by a high-density CMOS-based microelectrode array. We identify linear filters of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) by fitting a linear-nonlinear-Poisson (LNP) model. Our stimulus evokes spatially and temporally confined spiking responses in RGC which are accurately predicted by the LNP model. Furthermore, we find diverse shapes of linear filters in the linear stage of the model, suggesting diverse preferred electrical stimuli of RGCs. The linear filter base identified by our approach could provide a starting point of a model-guided search for improved stimuli for retinal prosthetics.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlindnessElectric StimulationElectrodesFemaleLightLikelihood FunctionsMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMicroarray AnalysisMicroelectrodesModels, NeurologicalNormal DistributionPhotic StimulationRetinal Ganglion Cells

Identifiers

PMID32251331
PMCPMC7090015
OpenAlexW3012596002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.