Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32251322›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers.

Vien T Truong, Cassady Palmer, Michael Young, Sarah Wolking, Tam N M Ngo, Brandy Sheets, Chelsey Hausfeld, Allison Ornella, Michael D Taylor, Karolina M Zareba and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Training and clinical testing of artificial intelligence derived right atrial cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurements.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Editorial: Insights in cardiovascular imaging: 2021.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vien T TruongThe Christ Hospital Health Network, The Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Cassady PalmerThe Christ Hospital Health Network, The Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Michael YoungThe Christ Hospital Health Network, The Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Sarah WolkingThe Christ Hospital Health Network, The Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Tam N M NgoThe Christ Hospital Health Network, The Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Brandy SheetsThe Christ Hospital Health Network, The Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Chelsey HausfeldThe Christ Hospital Health Network, The Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Allison OrnellaThe Christ Hospital Health Network, The Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Michael D TaylorCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Karolina M ZarebaOhio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Subha V RamanIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Wojciech MazurThe Christ Hospital Health Network, The Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. wojciech.mazur@thechristhospital.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), and more recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT) provides insight into all phases of atrial function. The aim of our study was to compare all phases of RA strain using CMR-FT and STE and also assess the relationship between RA and LA strain. A total of 61 healthy volunteers with mean age of 45 ± 13 years had adequate tracking for analysis on CMR-FT and 2D-STE. Females had larger RA reservoir strain (39 ± 15% vs. 32 ± 13%, p = 0.046) and conduit strain (26 ± 12% vs. 20 ± 9%, p = 0.03) when compared to males, but was not the case with booster strain (14 ± 7% vs. 12 ± 6%, p = 0.45). In comparison with STE derived strain, the RA reservoir and conduit strain were not significantly different between CMR-FT and the three echocardiography gating methods (p > 0.05 for all). Noticeably, there were no significant differences in strain and strain rate between RA and LA function using CMR-FT (p > 0.05 for all). RA strain and strain rate using CMR-FT had fair and good intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and had superior reproducibility compared to STE derived strain.

Indexed as

AdultAtrial FunctionEchocardiographyFemaleHealthy VolunteersHeart AtriaHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID32251322
PMCPMC7089993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.