Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32251314›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Usefulness of diffusion tensor imaging findings as biomarkers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Seol-Hee Baek, Jinseok Park, Yoo Hwan Kim, Hung Youl Seok, Ki-Wook Oh, Hee-Jin Kim, Ye-Ji Kwon, Youngbo Sim, Woo-Suk Tae, Seung Hyun Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Seol-Hee Baek *Department of Neurology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3656-1833
Jinseok Park *Department of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6581-5831
Yoo Hwan KimDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, 14068, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9532-5769
Hung Youl SeokDepartment of Neurology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, 42601, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9938-5355
Ki-Wook OhDepartment of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-629X
Hee-Jin KimDepartment of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7880-690X
Ye-Ji KwonDepartment of Neurology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Youngbo SimBrain Convergence Research Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Woo-Suk TaeBrain Convergence Research Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-0713
Seung Hyun KimDepartment of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea. kimsh1@hanyang.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9644-9598
Byung-Jo KimDepartment of Neurology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea. nukbj@korea.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0445-7185
Hanyang University · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRKorea University · KRHallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRKeimyung University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease. However, no reliable biomarkers have been identified to represent the clinical status. This study aimed to investigate whether diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) findings are useful imaging biomarkers to indicate the clinical status of ALS patients. Ninety-six probable or definite ALS cases and 47 age- and sex-matched, normal controls were enrolled. Demographic and clinical data were collected at the time of DTI. DTI data were acquired using a 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner and analysed by voxel-wise statistical analyses for fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity, mean diffusivity, and mode of anisotropy. Compared with the healthy control group, the ALS group had significant differences in DTI scalars in the diffuse tracts of the brain, which was predominant in the corticospinal tract at the brainstem and cerebellar peduncle area. Furthermore, the DTI values correlated with the ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) scores and the delta ALSFRS-R score representing the rate of disease progression. The subgroup analysis revealed a more severe and widespread brain degeneration was observed in rapidly progressive ALS. Therefore, our results suggest that DTI findings are useful as imaging biomarkers for evaluating the clinical severity and rate of disease progression in ALS.

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingNeuroimagingAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisBrain StemCase-Control StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPyramidal TractsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesWhite Matter

Identifiers

PMID32251314
PMCPMC7090054
OpenAlexW3012895298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.