Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32250471›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2020

Mucosal concentrations of N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid related to endoscopic activity in ulcerative colitis patients with mesalamine.

Tomohiro Fukuda, Makoto Naganuma, Kaoru Takabayashi, Yuya Hagihara, Shun Tanemoto, Ena Nomura, Yusuke Yoshimatsu, Shinya Sugimoto, Kosaku Nanki, Shinta Mizuno and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tomohiro FukudaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6539-5002
Makoto NaganumaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4244-3243
Kaoru TakabayashiCenter for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuya HagiharaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shun TanemotoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ena NomuraDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke YoshimatsuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinya SugimotoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kosaku NankiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinta MizunoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yohei MikamiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kayoko FukuharaCenter for Preventive Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohisa SujinoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto MutaguchiCenter for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nagamu InoueCenter for Preventive Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruhiko OgataCenter for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi IwaoCenter for Preventive Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki AbeSchool of Data Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Takanori KanaiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aim5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is a fundamental treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). 5-ASA is taken up into the colonic mucosa and metabolized to N-acetyl-5-ASA (Ac-5-ASA). Few studies have assessed whether mucosal 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA concentrations are associated with endoscopic remission. This study aimed to investigate differences in 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA concentrations according to endoscopic activity.

methodsThis single-center, prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted between March 2018 and February 2019. UC patients who were administered with 5-ASA medication for at least 8 weeks before sigmoidoscopy were enrolled. Mucosal 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The primary endpoint was defined as the difference in mucosal concentrations of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA, according to the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES).

resultsMucosal concentrations were analyzed in 50 patients. In the sigmoid colon, the median 5-ASA concentration in patients with MES of 0 (17.3 ng/mg) was significantly higher than MES ≥ 1 (6.4 ng/mg) (P = 0.019). The median 5-ASA concentrations in patients with Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity ≤ 1 (16.4 ng/mg) were also significantly higher than in patients with Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity ≥ 2 (4.63 ng/mg) (P = 0.047). In the sigmoid colon, the concentration of Ac-5-ASA was higher in patients with MES of 0 (21.2 ng/mg) than in patients with MES ≥ 1 (5.81 ng/mg) (P = 0.022).

conclusionsThe present study showed that mucosal Ac-5-ASA concentrations, as well as 5-ASA concentrations, are higher in UC patients with endoscopic remission. Ac-5-ASA may be useful for a biomarker of 5-ASA efficacy.

Indexed as

SigmoidoscopyAdultAminosalicylic AcidsBiomarkersColitis, UlcerativeColon, SigmoidCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntestinal MucosaMaleMesalamineMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeAminosalicylic AcidsBiomarkersMesalamineN-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid5-Aminosalicylic acidMucosal concentrationUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID32250471
PMCPMC7687243
OpenAlexW3014832808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.