ArticleJAMA network open2020
Economic Evaluation of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy by Site of Care Among Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 70 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Second-Line Large B Cell Lymphoma: Lessons from Phase 3 Trials. An Expert Panel Opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2022Guideline
- Economic Evidence on Potentially Curative Gene Therapy Products: A Systematic Literature Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2021Pooled it
- Lisocabtagene maraleucel for R/R LBCL in patients not intended for HSCT: final results of the phase 2 PILOT study.Blood advances · 2025Trial
- Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Disseminated intravascular coagulation in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: a 6-year nationwide analysis of clinical outcomes and health care resource utilization in patients with hematologic malignancies.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Article
- The immunoecology of occult hepatitis B virus infection: genetic remodeling and the immune-mediated microcosm.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in pediatric neurological autoimmune diseases: mechanisms, clinical applications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Financial venous stasis and thrombosis: A circulatory architecture for frozen capital and high-value care.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2026Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor technology: an emerging translational immunotherapy in nonneoplastic diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Advancing access to CAR T-cell therapy: insights and real-world experience from a community oncology practice.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Health care resource utilization and costs of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies across different settings of care: A real-world data analysis.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- CAR-Based Cell and Gene Therapies: Global Clinical Landscape and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies from ClinicalTrials.gov.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2025Review
- Introducing CAR-T Therapy in Kazakhstan: Establishing Academic-Scale Lentiviral Vector and CAR-T Cell Production.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Emerging frontiers in adoptive cell therapies: innovations, challenges, and future perspectives.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Single-cell RNA sequencing of human double-negative T cells reveals a favorable cellular signature for cancer therapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Diverse potential of chimeric antigen receptor-engineered cell therapy: Beyond cancer.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor cell therapies for cancer: progress made and remaining roadblocks.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Translational PK-PD model for in vivo CAR-T-cell therapy delivered using CAR mRNA-loaded polymeric nanoparticle vector.Clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Outpatient administration of CAR T-cell therapies using a strategy of no remote monitoring and early CRS intervention.Blood advances · 2024Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies are currently administered at a limited number of cancer centers and are primarily delivered in an inpatient setting. However, variations in total costs associated with these therapies remain unknown. Objective: To estimate the economic differences in the administration of CAR T-cell therapy by the site of care and the incidence of key adverse events. Design, Setting, and Participants: A decision-tree model was designed to capture clinical outcomes and associated costs during a predefined period (from lymphodepletion to 30 days after the receipt of CAR T-cell infusion) to account for the potential incidence of acute adverse events and to evaluate variations in total costs for the administration of CAR T-cell therapy by site of care. Cost estimates were from the health care practitioner perspective and were based on data obtained from the literature and publicly available databases, including the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample, the Medicare Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System, the Medicare physician fee schedule, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System, and the IBM Micromedex RED BOOK. The model evaluated an average adult patient with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received CAR T-cell therapy in an academic inpatient hospital or nonacademic specialty oncology network. Intervention: The administration of CAR T-cell therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Total cost of the administration of CAR T-cell therapy by site of care. The costs associated with lymphodepletion, acquisition and infusion of CAR T cells, and management of acute adverse events were also examined. Results: The estimated total cost of care associated with the administration of CAR T-cell therapy was $454 611 (95% CI, $452 466-$458 267) in the academic hospital inpatient setting compared with $421 624 (95% CI, $417 204-$422 325) in the nonacademic specialty oncology network setting, for a difference of $32 987. After excluding the CAR T-cell acquisition cost, hospitalization and office visit costs were $53 360 (65.3% of the total cost) in academic inpatient hospitals and $23 526 (48.4% of the total cost) in nonacademic specialty oncology networks. The administration of CAR T-cell therapy in nonacademic specialty oncology networks was associated with a $29 834 (55.9%) decrease in hospitalization and office visit costs and a $3154 (20.1%) decrease in procedure costs. Conclusions and Relevance: The potential availability of CAR T-cell therapies that are associated with a lower incidence of adverse events and are suitable for outpatient administration may reduce the total costs of care by enabling the use of these therapies in nonacademic specialty oncology networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.