Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32250359›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2020

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance.

David A E Bolton, Mahmoud Mansour

Registry-linked trialAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05107817 (Catching and Throwing Exercises to Improve Reactive Balance), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05107817 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Catching and Throwing Exercises to Improve Reactive Balance: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol for the Comparison of Aquatic and Dry-land Training Environments

TypeinterventionalSponsorEadric BresselRan2026 to 2027Enrolled44ConditionsAging, Aged, Accidental Falls, Postural BalanceArmsExercise intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The ability to increase the base of support and recover stability is limited in its generalisation for different balance perturbation tasks.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David A E BoltonDepartment of Kinesiology & Health Science, Utah State University; dave.bolton@usu.edu.
Mahmoud MansourDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Utah State University.

Funding

Before the Fall: Anticipatory Brain Roles in Reactive Balance ControlR21AG061688 · NIA · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BOLTON, DAVID A · 2019 to 2020
$366k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG061688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of reactive balance traditionally imposes some type of perturbation to upright stance or gait followed by measurement of the resultant corrective behavior. These measures include muscle responses, limb movements, ground reaction forces, and even direct neurophysiological measures such as electroencephalography. Using this approach, researchers and clinicians can infer some basic principles regarding how the nervous system controls balance to avoid a fall. One limitation with the way in which these assessments are currently used is that they heavily emphasize reflexive actions without any need to revise automatic postural reactions. Such an exclusive focus on these highly stereotypical reactions would fail to adequately address how we can modify these reactions should the need arise (e.g., avoiding an obstacle with a recovery step). This would appear to be a glaring omission when one considers the enormous complexity of the environments we face daily. Overall, the status quo when evaluating the neural control of balance fails to truly expose how higher brain resources contribute to preventing falls in complex settings. The present protocol offers a way to require suppression of automatic, but inappropriate corrective balance reactions, and force a selection among alternative action choices to successfully recover balance following postural perturbation.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsFemaleGaitHumansMaleMovementNervous System Physiological PhenomenaPostural Balance

Identifiers

PMID32250359
PMCPMC7561077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.