Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32250304›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2020

Costs of Early Stage Alzheimer's Disease in the United States: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study (GERAS-US)1.

Rebecca L Robinson, Dorene M Rentz, Jeffrey Scott Andrews, Anthony Zagar, Yongin Kim, Valerie Bruemmer, Ronald L Schwartz, Wenyu Ye, Howard M Fillit

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Measuring health spillover effects in household members of adolescents and elderly individuals with health issues in China.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca L RobinsonEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Dorene M RentzHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeffrey Scott AndrewsEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Anthony ZagarEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Yongin KimEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Valerie BruemmerEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ronald L SchwartzMemory Center/Hattiesburg Clinic, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Wenyu YeEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Howard M FillitGeriatric Medicine, Palliative Care and Neuroscience, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USAlzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation · USHattiesburg Clinic · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCosts associated with early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD; mild cognitive impairment [MCI] and mild dementia [MILD]) are understudied.

objectiveTo compare costs associated with MCI and MILD due to AD in the United States.

methodsData included baseline patient/study partner medical history, healthcare resource utilization, and outcome assessments as part of a prospective cohort study. Direct, indirect, and total societal costs were derived by applying standardized unit costs to resources for the 1-month pre-baseline period (USD2017). Costs/month for MCI and MILD cohorts were compared using analysis of variance models. To strengthen the confidence of diagnosis, amyloid-β (Aβ) tests were included and analyses were replicated stratifying within each cohort by amyloid status [+ /-].

resultsPatients (N = 1327) with MILD versus MCI had higher total societal costs/month ($4243 versus $2816; p < 0.001). These costs were not significantly different within each severity cohort by amyloid status. The largest fraction of overall costs were informal caregiver costs (45.1%) for the MILD cohort, whereas direct medical patient costs were the largest for the MCI cohort (39.0%). Correspondingly, caregiver time spent on basic activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental ADLs, and supervision time was twice as high for MILD versus MCI (all p < 0.001).

conclusionEarly AD poses a financial burden, and despite higher functioning among those with MCI, caregivers were significantly impacted. The major cost driver was the patient's clinical cognitive-functional status and not amyloid status. Differences were primarily due to rising need for caregiver support.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth Care CostsPatient Acceptance of Health CareActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCaregiversCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansMaleMiddle AgedAmyloidburden of illnessdementiaeconomic burdenflorbetapir F18mild cognitive impairmentsocietal burden

Identifiers

PMID32250304
PMCPMC7306889
OpenAlexW3014253589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.