Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32250300›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2020

Cognitive Correlates of Digital Clock Drawing Metrics in Older Adults with and without Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Catherine Dion, Franchesca Arias, Shawna Amini, Randall Davis, Dana Penney, David J Libon, Catherine C Price

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Causal mediation analysis of the neuroprotection ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catherine DionDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Franchesca AriasAging Brain Center at Hebrew Senior Life, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Shawna AminiDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Randall DavisComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Dana PenneyDepartment of Neurology, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
David J LibonDepartment of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Psychology, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA.
Catherine C PriceDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
University of Florida - Mt. Sinai Medical Center AD Research CenterP50AG047266 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI FEBO, MARCELO · 2015 to 2019
$7.3M
PRECEDE: PREsurgical Cognitive Evaluation via Digital clockfacEdrawingR01AG055337 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CATHERINE E PRICE, Parisa Rashidi · 2017 to 2026
$3.2M
White Matter Connectivity and PD Cognitive PhenotypesR01NS082386 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PRICE, CATHERINE E · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Post-Operative Cognitive Decline in Older AdultsR01NR014181 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PRICE, CATHERINE E · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIA NIH HHS P50 AG047266NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055337NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082386NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA digital version of the clock drawing test (dCDT) provides new latency and graphomotor behavioral measurements. These variables have yet to be validated with external neuropsychological domains in non-demented adults.

objectiveThe current investigation reports on cognitive constructs associated with selected dCDT latency and graphomotor variables and compares performances between individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and non-MCI peers.

methods202 non-demented older adults (age 68.79 ± 6.18, 46% female, education years 16.02 ± 2.70) completed the dCDT and a comprehensive neuropsychological protocol. dCDT variables of interest included: total completion time (TCT), pre-first hand latency (PFHL), post-clock face latency (PCFL), and clock face area (CFA). We also explored variables of percent time drawing (i.e., 'ink time') versus percent time not drawing (i.e., 'think time'). Neuropsychological domains of interest included processing speed, working memory, language, and declarative memory.

resultsAdjusting for age and premorbid cognitive reserve metrics, command TCT positively correlated with multiple cognitive domains; PFHL and PCFL negatively associated with worse performance on working memory and processing speed tests. For Copy, TCT, PCFL, and PFHL negatively correlated with processing speed, and CFA negatively correlated with language. Between-group analyses show MCI participants generated slower command TCT, produced smaller CFA, and required more command 'think' (% Think) than 'ink' (% Ink) time.

conclusionCommand dCDT variables of interest were primarily processing speed and working memory dependent. MCI participants showed dCDT differences relative to non-MCI peers, suggesting the dCDT may assist with classification. Results document cognitive construct validation to digital metrics of clock drawing.

Indexed as

LanguageAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsAttentioncognitioncognitive agingneuropsychologyprocessing speed

Identifiers

PMID32250300
PMCPMC7217723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.