Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32250202›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2020

Time to diagnosis of symptomatic gastric and oesophageal cancer in the Netherlands: Where is the room for improvement?

N F van Erp, C W Helsper, P Slottje, D Brandenbarg, F L Büchner, K M van Asselt, Jwm Muris, M F Kortekaas, Phm Peeters, N J de Wit

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predictors of textbook outcome following oesophagogastric cancer surgery.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Gaps in Providers' Knowledge Delays Gastric Cancer Diagnosis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. UEGWeek: The modern School of Athens.United European gastroenterology journal · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

N F van ErpJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6165-1056
C W HelsperJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
P SlottjeDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
D BrandenbargDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
F L BüchnerDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
K M van AsseltDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jwm MurisDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8780-476X
M F KortekaasJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Phm PeetersJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
N J de WitJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam Public Health · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn efficient diagnostic pathway and early stage diagnosis for cancer patients is widely pursued. This study aims to chart the duration of the diagnostic pathway for patients with symptomatic oesophageal and gastric cancer, to identify factors associated with long duration and to assess the association of duration with tumour stage at diagnosis.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study, using electronic health records of six routine primary care databases covering about 640,000 patients, partly linked to the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Symptomatic patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer (2010-2015) that presented in primary care were included. Duration of four diagnostic intervals was determined: patient interval; first symptoms to primary care consultation, primary care interval; consultation to referral, secondary care interval; referral to diagnosis, and the diagnostic interval; consultation to diagnosis. Characteristics associated with 'long duration' (≥P75 duration) were assessed using log-binomial regression. Median durations were stratified for tumour stages.

resultsAmong 312 symptomatic patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer, median durations were: patient interval: 29 days (interquartile interval 15-73), primary care interval: 12 days (interquartile interval 1-43), secondary care interval: 13 days (interquartile interval 6-29) and diagnostic interval: 31 days (11-74). Patient interval duration was comparable for patients with and without alarm symptoms. Absence of cancer-specific alarm symptoms was associated with 'long duration' of primary care interval and secondary care interval: relative risk 5.0 (95% confidence interval 2.7-9.1) and 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.3-3.7), respectively. Median diagnostic interval duration for local stage disease was 51 days (interquartile interval 13-135) versus 27 days (interquartile interval 11-71) for advanced stage (

conclusionIn the diagnostic pathway of upper gastrointestinal cancers, the longest interval is the patient interval. Reducing time to diagnosis may be achieved by improving patients' awareness of alarm symptoms and by diagnostic strategies which better identify cancer patients despite low suspicion.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAgedAge FactorsDelayed DiagnosisEarly Detection of CancerElectronic Health RecordsEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth EducationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsPrimary Health CareQuality Improvementdelaydiagnostic pathwaydurationgastric cancergeneral practiceoesophageal cancerprimary careUpper gastrointestinal cancer

Identifiers

PMID32250202
PMCPMC7268938
OpenAlexW3014541413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.