Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32250136›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2020

The spatial distribution of attention predicts familiarity strength during encoding and retrieval.

Michelle M Ramey, John M Henderson, Andrew P Yonelinas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Writing Abilities in Compulsive Prisoners.Frontiers in psychology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle M RameyDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis.ORCID 0000-0002-9302-6706
John M HendersonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis.
Andrew P YonelinasDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis.

Funding

Guiding Attention in Real-World ScenesR01EY027792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI John M Henderson · 2017 to 2026
$2.5M
Plasticity, Perception, and the Medial Temporal LobesR01EY025999 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI YONELINAS, ANDREW P · 2016 to 2022
$2.3M
National Institutes of Health; National Eye InstituteNEI NIH HHS R01 EY025999NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The memories we form are determined by what we attend to, and conversely, what we attend to is influenced by our memory for past experiences. Although we know that shifts of attention via eye movements are related to memory during encoding and retrieval, the role of specific memory processes in this relationship is unclear. There is evidence that attention may be especially important for some forms of memory (i.e., conscious recollection), and less so for others (i.e., familiarity-based recognition and unconscious influences of memory), but results are conflicting with respect to both the memory processes and eye movement patterns involved. To address this, we used a confidence-based method of isolating eye movement indices of spatial attention that are related to different memory processes (i.e., recollection, familiarity strength, and unconscious memory) during encoding and retrieval of real-world scenes. We also developed a new method of measuring the dispersion of eye movements, which proved to be more sensitive to memory processing than previously used measures. Specifically, in 2 studies, we found that familiarity strength-that is, changes in subjective reports of memory confidence-increased with (a) more dispersed patterns of viewing during encoding, (b) less dispersed viewing during retrieval, and (c) greater overlap in regions viewed between encoding and retrieval (i.e., resampling). Recollection was also related to these eye movements in a similar manner, though the associations with recollection were less consistent across experiments. Furthermore, we found no evidence for effects related to unconscious influences of memory. These findings indicate that attentional processes during viewing may not preferentially relate to recollection, and that the spatial distribution of eye movements is directly related to familiarity-based memory during encoding and retrieval. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AdultAttentionEye MovementsFemaleHumansMaleMemoryMental RecallPhotic StimulationRecognition, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID32250136
PMCPMC7541439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.