SynthesisParasitology2020
Filarial worms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diversity in animals from Iran with emphasis on human cases.
Synthesis in Parasitology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global distribution ofParasitology · 2022Pooled it
- Confirmed cases of human Onchocerca lupi infection: a systematic review of an emerging threat.Parasitology research · 2021Pooled it
- Lymphatic filariasis in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Parasitology research · 2021Pooled it
- Global Research Trends in Emerging Zoonosis Due to (the Filarial Nematode)Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mapping Global Trends inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- An investigation of the prevalence of equine filariosis in North and Northeast of Iran.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024Article
- Canine microfilaraemia in some regions of Iran.Parasites & vectors · 2022Article
- Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published literature (2016-2020).Tropical medicine and health · 2022Review
- Prevalence ofGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2022Article
- Geographic Spatial Distribution Patterns ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate the prevalence reports of filariasis in animals in Iran along with human cases. Studies were screened, relevant papers were selected and the random-effect model was used by forest plot with 95% confidence interval (CI). Of 17 records of human case-reports, particularly from Khuzestan province (5 cases), Dirofilaria repens was the most detected parasite (10 cases) with higher involvement of the right eye (7 cases) than other organs. Eleven animal species were reported to be parasitised by filarioids in Iran. The prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in canids was 14.69% (95% CI: 10.33-19.67), with highest rates (20.92%; 95% CI: 13.84-29.03) in free-ranging dogs. Male (10.07%; 95% CI: 5.10-16.47) and more than 1-year old (20.77%; 95% CI: 8.66-36.42) dogs were more likely to be found infected. The frequency of other filarioids of zoonotic interest was: Acanthocheilonema reconditum in dogs 2.15% (95% CI: 0.71-4.33), Dipetalonema evansi in camels 10.16% (95% CI: 4.73-17.34), Onchocerca cervicalis in horses 3.63% (95% CI: 1.44-6.75%) and Onchocerca fasciata 16.57% (95% CI: 10.12-24.24%) in camels. Still, our knowledge on parasitic filariae in Iran is limited and more investigation is needed in both human and animal populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.