Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32249510›Full record

ArticleChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology2020

Assessing Reproducibility in Amyloid β Research: Impact of Aβ Sources on Experimental Outcomes.

Alejandro R Foley, Jevgenij A Raskatov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A robust preparation method for the amyloidogenic and intrinsically disordered amyloid-α peptide.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alejandro R FoleyDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
Jevgenij A RaskatovDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0082-9113

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ IMSD PROGRAMR25GM058903 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI JURICA, MELISSA S · 1999 to 2019
$12.2M
Using Chirality to Understand and Control Amyloid Beta Neuronal Uptake and ToxicityR01AG074954 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI Jevgenij Raskatov · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
Chiral Inactivation of Amyloid beta Actions in Cytotoxicity, Synaptic transmission and PlasticityR21AG058074 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI RASKATOV, JEVGENIJ · 2017 to 2018
$430k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG074954NIA NIH HHS R21 AG058074NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM058903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The difficulty of synthesizing and purifying the amyloid β (Aβ) peptide, combined with its high aggregation propensity and low solubility under physiological conditions, leads to a wide variety of experimental results from kinetic assays to biological activity. Thus, it becomes challenging to reproduce outcomes, and this limits our ability to rely on reported results as the foundation for new research. This article examines variability of the Aβ peptide from different sources, comparing purity, and oligomer and fibril formation propensity side by side. The results highlight the importance of performing rigorous controls so that meaningful biophysical, biochemical, and neurobiological results can be obtained to improve our understanding on Aβ.

Indexed as

Amyloid beta-PeptidesProtein AggregatesAmyloid beta-PeptidesProtein Aggregates

Identifiers

PMID32249510
PMCPMC7647053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.