ArticleMedical physics2020
A new approach to modeling the microdosimetry of proton therapy beams.
Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo revisit the formulation of the mean chord length in microdosimetry and replace it by the particle mean free path appropriate for modelings in radiobiology.
methodsWe perform a collision-by-collision followed by event-by-event Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation and calculate double-averaged stepping length, 〈〈l〉〉, for a range of target sizes from mm down to μm and depth in water. We consider 〈〈l〉〉 to represent the particle mean free path.
resultsWe show that 〈〈l〉〉 continuously drops as a function of depth and asymptotically saturates to a minimum value in low energies, where it exhibits a universal scaling behavior, independent of particle nominal beam energy. We correlate 〈〈l〉〉 to linear density of DNA damage, complexities of initial lethal lesions and illustrate a relative difference between predictive RBEs in model calculations using mean chord length vs the proposed mean free path. We demonstrate consistency between rapid increase in RBE within and beyond the Bragg peak and 〈〈l〉〉, a decreasing function of depth. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionAn interplay between localities in imparted energy at nanometer scale and subsequent physio-chemical processes, causalities and pathways in DNA damage requires substitution of geometrical chord length of cell nuclei by mean-free path of proton and charged particles to account for a mean distance among sequential collisions in DNA materials. To this end, the event averaging over cell volume in the current microdosimetry formalism must be superseded by the collision averaging scored within the volume. The former, is fundamentally a global attribute of the cell nuclei surfaces and boundaries and is characterized by their membrane diameters, hence such global indices are not appropriate to quantitatively represent the radiobiological strength of the particles and their RBE variabilities that is associated with the sensitivities to local structure of the collisions and their spatio-temporal collective patterns in DNA materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.