ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2020
Comparing four methods of rearing Varroa destructor in vitro.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment and evaluation of a rearing method for Tropilaelaps mercedesae using gelatin capsules.Experimental & applied acarology · 2026Article
- Developing a method to rear Varroa destructor in vitro.Experimental & applied acarology · 2024Article
- The Effect of Comb Cell Size on the Development ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Life-history stage determines the diet of ectoparasitic mites on their honey bee hosts.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Honey Bee Larval Hemolymph as a Source of Key Nutrients and Proteins Offers a Promising Medium forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Integrated Pest Management Control of Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae), the Most Damaging Pest of (Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae)) Colonies.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The parasitic mite Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman continues to devastate western honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies throughout most of the world where they are managed. The development of a method to rear Varroa in vitro would allow for year-round Varroa research, rapidly advancing our progress towards controlling the mite. We created two separate experiments to address this objective. First, we determined which of four in vitro rearing methods yields the greatest number of Varroa offspring. Second, we attempted to improve the rearing rates achieved with that method. The four methods tested included (1) rearing Varroa on honey bee pupae in gelatin capsules, (2) rearing Varroa on in vitro-reared honey bees, (3) group rearing Varroa on honey bee pupae in Petri dishes, and (4) providing Varroa a bee-derived diet. The number of reproducing females and the number of fully mature offspring were significantly higher in the gelatin capsules maintained at 75% RH than in any other method. A 2 × 3 full factorial design was used to test combinations of gelatin capsule size (6 and 7 mm diameter) and relative humidity (65, 75, or 85%) on Varroa rearing success. Varroa reproduction and survival were significantly higher in 7-mm-diameter gelatin capsules maintained at 75% RH than in those maintained in 6-mm capsules and at the other humidities. By identifying factors that influence Varroa reproductive success in vitro, this work provides an important foundation for the development of future rearing protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.