Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32249390›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2020

Preoperative assessment of extrathyroidal extension of papillary thyroid carcinomas by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.

Shudong Hu, Heng Zhang, Zongqiong Sun, Yuxi Ge, Jie Li, Chunjing Yu, Zhaohong Deng, Weiqiang Dou, Xian Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shudong HuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital, Jiangnan University, No. 200, Huihe Road, Wuxi, 214062, Jiangsu, China.
Heng ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital, Jiangnan University, No. 200, Huihe Road, Wuxi, 214062, Jiangsu, China.
Zongqiong SunDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital, Jiangnan University, No. 200, Huihe Road, Wuxi, 214062, Jiangsu, China.
Yuxi GeDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital, Jiangnan University, No. 200, Huihe Road, Wuxi, 214062, Jiangsu, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Hospital, Jiangnan University, No. 200, Huihe Road, Wuxi, 214062, Jiangsu, China.
Chunjing YuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214062, China.
Zhaohong DengSchool of Digital Media, Jiangnan University and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Digital Design and Software Technology, Wuxi, 214122, China.
Weiqiang DouGE Healthcare, MR Research China, Beijing, 100176, China.
Xian WangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Renmin Hospital, Jiangsu University, No. 8, Dianli Road, Zhenjiang, 212002, Jiangsu, China. wangxian8812@126.com.

Funding

Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality No. N20192027Wuxi Commission of Health No. MS201901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess and compare the diagnostic performances of preoperative ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting extrathyroidal extension (ETE) in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board. Preoperative US and MRI were performed on 225 patients who underwent surgery for PTC between May 2014 and December 2018. The US and MRI features of ETE of each case were retrospectively and independently investigated by two radiologists. The diagnostic performances of US and MRI, including their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) for ETE, and their accuracy in predicting ETE were analyzed.

resultsHigher sensitivity and NPV in predicting minimal ETE were observed in US (87.5% and 76.2%, respectively) compared with MRI (71.3% and 61.7%, respectively) (p = 0.006 and p = 0.046, respectively). Meanwhile, MRI (85.4%) showed higher sensitivity than US (66.7%) in assessing extensive ETE (p = 0.005). MRI also showed significantly higher specificity and PPV than US in assessing overall ETE (p = 0.025 and p = 0.025, respectively).

conclusionPreoperative US should be used as the first line in predicting minimal ETE, and MRI should be added in extensive ETE assessment. Compared with US, MRI had higher specificity and PPV in detecting the overall ETE of PTC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPreoperative CareRetrospective StudiesThyroid Cancer, PapillaryThyroid NeoplasmsUltrasonographyYoung AdultMagnetic resonance imagingNeoplasm stagingThyroid cancerUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.