Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32249360›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2020

A survey of school's preparedness for managing anaphylaxis in pupils with food allergy.

George Raptis, Mercedes Perez-Botella, Rebecca Totterdell, Konstantinos Gerasimidis, Louise J Michaelis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Adrenaline Auto-Injector Prescribing in Primary Care in England: An Analysis of Non-Standard Dosing.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Online food allergy and anaphylaxis education for school personnel is effective and scalable: experience with the allergyaware e-learning portal from 2015 to 2022.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Food Allergy Management Competence in Greek Schools.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

George RaptisDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Immunology & Allergy, Royal Hospital for Children, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Glasgow, UK. george.raptis@nhs.net.
Mercedes Perez-BotellaUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Rebecca TotterdellSchool of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, Human Nutrition, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Konstantinos GerasimidisSchool of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, Human Nutrition, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Louise J MichaelisDepartment of Immunology, Infectious Diseases & Allergy, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle, UK.
University of Glasgow · GBGreat North Children's Hospital · GBRoyal Hospital for Children · GBUniversity of Central Lancashire · GB

Funding

Anaphylaxis Campaign 98/14/GR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allergic diseases are on the increase and can affect the child's well-being. The aim of this survey was to assess regional schools' preparedness in dealing with anaphylaxis following the publication of national and international guidelines for schools in 2014. The survey was developed in 2015 and distributed to schools in Cumbria, North West England, UK between 2015 and 2016. Only 47% of the respondents (95% CI, 39-57%) felt confident to manage anaphylaxis. Schools without allergic pupils were significantly less likely to have a standard management protocol in place for emergencies compared to those with allergic pupils (p < 0.001). The majority of the schools indicated that further training was needed (81% (95% CI, 74-88%).Conclusion: At the time of the survey, schools' preparedness in the region, did not meet safety standards recommended by national and international organisations. Although schools have shown eagerness in accessing training in the management of anaphylaxis, tailored training for schools is not yet widely available. There is now an urgent need to design feasible training strategies that create a safe environment for allergic pupils across all UK schools. What is Known: • One quarter of the severe allergic reactions take place for the first time while at school with some of them being fatal. • School staff is ill-prepared in the management of anaphylaxis. Access to formal training is not widely available. What is New: • School staff remains unconfident in managing the severe allergic child. Training in the management of anaphylaxis is scarce, and when available, it does not offer the required depth to cover the holistic needs of allergic pupils. • Schools would welcome generic adrenaline autoinjectors and a national policy with central funding which would describe step by step the necessary measures for the management of anaphylaxis.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisFood HypersensitivityChildEnglandEpinephrineHumansSchoolsSurveys and QuestionnairesEpinephrineAnaphylaxisOrganisational policySchoolsSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32249360
PMCPMC7479013
OpenAlexW3014676895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.