ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2020
Utilizing physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict theoretically conceivable extreme elevation of serum flecainide concentration in an anuric hemodialysis patient with cirrhosis.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms of flecainide induced negative inotropy: An in silico study.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHigher drug concentrations in complex clinical scenarios in which multiple factors such as drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and comorbidities are simultaneously present are not necessarily rationalized in prospective clinical studies. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation of the anti-arrhythmic drug flecainide, as an example, were utilized to quantitatively rationalize the higher flecainide concentration in a complex clinical case involving end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cirrhosis, and the co-administration of mexiletine, a CYP1A2 inhibitor.
methodsThe developed flecainide PBPK model was used to evaluate the DDI effect (as measured by AUC ratio before and after inhibition) of mexiletine and the combined disease effects of ESRD and cirrhosis on flecainide exposure.
resultsThe predicted DDI effect of mexiletine was negligible or weak in anuric hemodialysis with cirrhosis population (mean [5th/95th percentiles], 1.23 [0.97-1.67]), although it was negligible in healthy volunteers (1.03 [1.02-1.05]). The predicted flecainide concentrations after multiple flecainide doses (50 mg BID) in the anuric hemodialysis with cirrhosis population were comparable with the observed value (3602 ng/mL), which fell between the predicted concentrations in the absence and presence of mexiletine (3043 [718-8499] and 5914 [880-20,624] ng/mL, respectively).
conclusionsThe PBPK simulation proposed a likely explanation that the observed higher flecainide concentration could be attributed to the combined effects of ESRD, cirrhosis, and a potential DDI with mexiletine. This approach provides quantitative insight into theoretically conceivable extremes in drug exposure occurring in complex clinical situations even if uncommon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.