Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32249347›Full record

ReviewArchives of toxicology2020

Designer drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effects.

Dino Luethi, Matthias E Liechti

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 104 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
23.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 243 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. αMolecular psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. 4,4'-DMARFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dino LuethiCenter for Physiology and Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Strasse 13a, 1090, Vienna, Austria. dino.luethi@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0874-4875
Matthias E LiechtiDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Schanzenstrasse 55, 4056, Basel, Switzerland. matthias.liechti@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1765-9659
TU Wien · ATUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychoactive substances with chemical structures or pharmacological profiles that are similar to traditional drugs of abuse continue to emerge on the recreational drug market. Internet vendors may at least temporarily sell these so-called designer drugs without adhering to legal statutes or facing legal consequences. Overall, the mechanism of action and adverse effects of designer drugs are similar to traditional drugs of abuse. Stimulants, such as amphetamines and cathinones, primarily interact with monoamine transporters and mostly induce sympathomimetic adverse effects. Agonism at μ-opioid receptors and γ-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA

Indexed as

CannabinoidsCentral Nervous System StimulantsDesigner DrugsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHallucinogensHumansIllicit DrugsMolecular StructurePsychotropic DrugsSerotoninCannabinoidsCentral Nervous System StimulantsDesigner DrugsHallucinogensIllicit DrugsPsychotropic DrugsSerotoninDesigner drugNew psychoactive substancePsychedelicStimulantSynthetic cannabinoidSynthetic opioid

Identifiers

PMID32249347
PMCPMC7225206
OpenAlexW3014121938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.