Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32249282›Full record

ArticleSoft matter2020

Loops versus lines and the compression stiffening of cells.

M C Gandikota, Katarzyna Pogoda, Anne van Oosten, T A Engstrom, A E Patteson, P A Janmey, J M Schwarz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Soft matter, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Force Transmission in Disordered Fibre Networks.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Cell nuclei as cytoplasmic rheometers.Biophysical journal · 2021
    Article
  12. Mechanical and Non-Mechanical Functions of Filamentous and Non-Filamentous Vimentin.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M C GandikotaPhysics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. mgandiko@syr.edu jschwarz@physics.syr.edu.
Katarzyna Pogoda
Anne van Oosten
T A Engstrom
A E Patteson
P A Janmey
J M Schwarz

Funding

Pathological consequences of altered tissue mechanics in fibrosisR01EB017753 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JANMEY, PAUL A, SHENOY, VIVEK · 2014 to 2025
$6.3M
Regulation of cell, tissue, and nucleus function by mechanical properties of biopolymer networksR35GM136259 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Paul A Janmey · 2020 to 2026
$3.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017753NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both animal and plant tissue exhibit a nonlinear rheological phenomenon known as compression stiffening, or an increase in moduli with increasing uniaxial compressive strain. Does such a phenomenon exist in single cells, which are the building blocks of tissues? One expects an individual cell to compression soften since the semiflexible biopolymer-based cytoskeletal network maintains the mechanical integrity of the cell and in vitro semiflexible biopolymer networks typically compression soften. To the contrary, we find that mouse embryonic fibroblasts (mEFs) compression stiffen under uniaxial compression via atomic force microscopy studies. To understand this finding, we uncover several potential mechanisms for compression stiffening. First, we study a single semiflexible polymer loop modeling the actomyosin cortex enclosing a viscous medium modeled as an incompressible fluid. Second, we study a two-dimensional semiflexible polymer/fiber network interspersed with area-conserving loops, which are a proxy for vesicles and fluid-based organelles. Third, we study two-dimensional fiber networks with angular-constraining crosslinks, i.e. semiflexible loops on the mesh scale. In the latter two cases, the loops act as geometric constraints on the fiber network to help stiffen it via increased angular interactions. We find that the single semiflexible polymer loop model agrees well with the experimental cell compression stiffening finding until approximately 35% compressive strain after which bulk fiber network effects may contribute. We also find for the fiber network with area-conserving loops model that the stress-strain curves are sensitive to the packing fraction and size distribution of the area-conserving loops, thereby creating a mechanical fingerprint across different cell types. Finally, we make comparisons between this model and experiments on fibrin networks interlaced with beads as well as discuss implications for single cell compression stiffening at the tissue scale.

Indexed as

FibroblastsModels, TheoreticalRheologyActomyosinAnimalsFibrinMiceMicroscopy, Atomic ForcePolymersActomyosinFibrinPolymers

Identifiers

PMID32249282
PMCPMC7225031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.