Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32249271›Full record

Observational studyThe Kobe journal of medical sciences2020

Nursing Care Time for Newborns during Hospitalization in a Mixed Hospital Ward with an Obstetrics Department.

Kaori Nakai, Izumi Saito, Kayo Osawa

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Kobe journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaori NakaiDepartment of Nursing, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe, Japan.
Izumi SaitoDepartment of Nursing, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe, Japan.
Kayo OsawaDepartment of Biophysics, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to better understand the nursing care time spent with healthy term newborns from birth to discharge, giving insight into neonatal nursing staff management.

methodIn total, 30 healthy term newborns in a mixed hospital ward with an Obstetrics Department participated in this study. To measure care time, they had a wireless beacon attached to their cots. This measured how much time the nurses stayed in front of the cot from the time of birth until discharge, 24 hours/day. Collected data were tabulated every 24 hours after birth.

resultsSeventeen newborns had their data analyzed. The average length of hospital stay for the newborns was 8231.3 minutes. The average nursing care time for the newborns was 533.8 minutes. Nurses provided the highest care time during the first 24 hours after birth (157.6 minutes/24hr). After the first 24, the average nursing care time gradually decreased. The average nursing care time during the first 24 hours after birth was longer than the nursing care time for any other 24-hour periods, with a significant difference (p = 0.001 to 0.046).

conclusionThe nursing care time for healthy newborns gradually decreased with the passage of time after birth. Healthy newborns should be treated as individuals, and the number of nursing staff should be adjusted according to the number of newborns in the ward to ensure nursing care quality and to prevent life-threatening events during the first 24 hours after birth.

Indexed as

Infant CareNursing CareObstetrics and Gynecology Department, HospitalPerinatal CareFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfant, NewbornLength of StayMaleProspective StudiesContinuous nursing care time during hospitalizationLength of hospital stayMixed hospital wardNursing care time for newborns

Identifiers

PMID32249271
PMCPMC7447092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.