Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32249202›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2020

Circulating tumour-derived KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer cases are predominantly carried by very short fragments of cell-free DNA.

Maria Zvereva, Gabriel Roberti, Geoffroy Durand, Catherine Voegele, Minh Dao Nguyen, Tiffany M Delhomme, Priscilia Chopard, Eleonora Fabianova, Zora Adamcakova, Ivana Holcatova and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interpretable deep learning model of circulating genomics for quantitative survival prediction in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Maria ZverevaInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Genetic Cancer Susceptibility group, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France; Faculty of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Gabriel RobertiInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Genetic Cancer Susceptibility group, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France; Santa Casa de Sao Paulo of medical Sciences, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Geoffroy DurandInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Genetic Cancer Susceptibility group, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France.
Catherine VoegeleInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Genetic Cancer Susceptibility group, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France.
Minh Dao NguyenInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Genetic Cancer Susceptibility group, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France.
Tiffany M DelhommeInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Genetic Cancer Susceptibility group, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France.
Priscilia ChopardInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Genetic Cancer Susceptibility group, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France.
Eleonora FabianovaRegional Authority of Public Health, Banska Bystrica, and Faculty of Health, Catholic University, Ružomberok, Slovakia.
Zora AdamcakovaRegional Authority of Public Health, Banska Bystrica, and Faculty of Health, Catholic University, Ružomberok, Slovakia.
Ivana HolcatovaFirst Faculty of Medicine, Charles University of Prague, Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Prague, Czechia.
Lenka ForetovaMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Vladimir JanoutFaculty of Health Sciences, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czechia.
Paul BrennanInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Genetic Cancer Susceptibility group, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France.
Matthieu FollInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Genetic Cancer Susceptibility group, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France.
Graham B ByrnesInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Genetic Cancer Susceptibility group, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France.
James D McKayInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Genetic Cancer Susceptibility group, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France.
Ghislaine SceloInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Genetic Cancer Susceptibility group, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France.
Florence Le Calvez-KelmInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Genetic Cancer Susceptibility group, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, France. Electronic address: lecalvezf@iarc.fr.
Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRPublic Health Authority of the Slovak Republic · SKCharles University · CZLomonosov Moscow State University · RUMasaryk University · CZPalacký University Olomouc · CZ

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe DNA released into the bloodstream by malignant tumours· called circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), is often a small fraction of total cell-free DNA shed predominantly by hematopoietic cells and is therefore challenging to detect. Understanding the biological properties of ctDNA is key to the investigation of its clinical relevance as a non-invasive marker for cancer detection and monitoring.

methodsWe selected 40 plasma DNA samples of pancreatic cancer cases previously reported to carry a KRAS mutation at the 'hotspot' codon 12 and re-screened the cell-free DNA using a 4-size amplicons strategy (57 bp, 79 bp, 167 bp and 218 bp) combined with ultra-deep sequencing in order to investigate whether amplicon lengths could impact on the capacity of detection of ctDNA, which in turn could provide inference of ctDNA and non-malignant cell-free DNA size distribution.

findingsHigher KRAS amplicon size (167 bp and 218 bp) was associated with lower detectable cell-free DNA mutant allelic fractions (p < 0·0001), with up to 4·6-fold (95% CI: 2·6-8·1) difference on average when comparing the 218bp- and the 57bp-amplicons. The proportion of cases with detectable KRAS mutations was also hampered with increased amplicon lengths, with only half of the cases having detectable ctDNA using the 218 bp assay relative to those detected with amplicons less than 80 bp.

interpretationTumour-derived mutations are carried by shorter cell-free DNA fragments than fragments of wild-type allele. Targeting short amplicons increases the sensitivity of cell-free DNA assays for pancreatic cancer and should be taken into account for optimized assay design and for evaluating their clinical performance.

fundingIARC; MH CZ - DRO; MH SK; exchange program between IARC and Sao Paulo medical Sciences; French Cancer League.

Indexed as

AllelesBase SequenceBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesCirculating Tumor DNACodonComputational BiologyGene ExpressionGene FrequencyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreatitis, ChronicProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Sensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNACodonKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Cell-free DNAKRAS mutationsPancreatic cancer detectionPlasma

Identifiers

PMID32249202
PMCPMC7251242
OpenAlexW3014662088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.