ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2020
Accuracy of whole-genome sequence imputation using hybrid peeling in large pedigreed livestock populations.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis-ready VCF at Biobank scale using Zarr.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Analysis-ready VCF at Biobank scale using Zarr.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Article
- A general and efficient representation of ancestral recombination graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A cautionary tale of low-pass sequencing and imputation with respect to haplotype accuracy.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Using residual regressions to quantify and map signal leakage in genomic prediction.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Using pre-selected variants from large-scale whole-genome sequence data for single-step genomic predictions in pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- A genome-wide association study for loin depth and muscle pH in pigs from intensely selected purebred lines.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- The size and composition of haplotype reference panels impact the accuracy of imputation from low-pass sequencing in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Multi-line ssGBLUP evaluation using preselected markers from whole-genome sequence data in pigs.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Genomic prediction with whole-genome sequence data in intensely selected pig lines.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Rare and population-specific functional variation across pig lines.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- An imputed whole-genome sequence-based GWAS approach pinpoints causal mutations for complex traits in a specific swine population.Science China. Life sciences · 2022Article
- Imputation to whole-genome sequence and its use in genome-wide association studies for pork colour traits in crossbred and purebred pigs.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Increasing calling accuracy, coverage, and read-depth in sequence data by the use of haplotype blocks.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Rapid genotype imputation from sequence with reference panels.Nature genetics · 2021Article
- Evaluation of sequencing strategies for whole-genome imputation with hybrid peeling.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020Article
- Current status of genomic evaluation.Journal of animal science · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe coupling of appropriate sequencing strategies and imputation methods is critical for assembling large whole-genome sequence datasets from livestock populations for research and breeding. In this paper, we describe and validate the coupling of a sequencing strategy with the imputation method hybrid peeling in real animal breeding settings.
methodsWe used data from four pig populations of different size (18,349 to 107,815 individuals) that were widely genotyped at densities between 15,000 and 75,000 markers genome-wide. Around 2% of the individuals in each population were sequenced (most of them at 1× or 2× and 37-92 individuals per population, totalling 284, at 15-30×). We imputed whole-genome sequence data with hybrid peeling. We evaluated the imputation accuracy by removing the sequence data of the 284 individuals with high coverage, using a leave-one-out design. We simulated data that mimicked the sequencing strategy used in the real populations to quantify the factors that affected the individual-wise and variant-wise imputation accuracies using regression trees.
resultsImputation accuracy was high for the majority of individuals in all four populations (median individual-wise dosage correlation: 0.97). Imputation accuracy was lower for individuals in the earliest generations of each population than for the rest, due to the lack of marker array data for themselves and their ancestors. The main factors that determined the individual-wise imputation accuracy were the genotyping status, the availability of marker array data for immediate ancestors, and the degree of connectedness to the rest of the population, but sequencing coverage of the relatives had no effect. The main factors that determined variant-wise imputation accuracy were the minor allele frequency and the number of individuals with sequencing coverage at each variant site. Results were validated with the empirical observations.
conclusionsWe demonstrate that the coupling of an appropriate sequencing strategy and hybrid peeling is a powerful strategy for generating whole-genome sequence data with high accuracy in large pedigreed populations where only a small fraction of individuals (2%) had been sequenced, mostly at low coverage. This is a critical step for the successful implementation of whole-genome sequence data for genomic prediction and fine-mapping of causal variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.