ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020
Revealing the information contents of memory within the stimulus information representation framework.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative AI as a transformational logic for cognitive neuroscience.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Shape information used for face identity and expression recognition is highly versatile and context specific.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The role of expansion and adaptability of face-space for individual differences in face identity processing.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Reconstructing Spatiotemporal Trajectories of Visual Object Memories in the Human Brain.eNeuro · 2024Article
- Dissecting muscle synergies in the task space.eLife · 2024Article
- Cultural facial expressions dynamically convey emotion category and intensity information.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Network Communications Flexibly Predict Visual Contents That Enhance Representations for Faster Visual Categorization.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Facial expressions elicit multiplexed perceptions of emotion categories and dimensions.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Grounding deep neural network predictions of human categorization behavior in understandable functional features: The case of face identity.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Perception-driven dynamics of mimicry based on attractor field model.Interface focus · 2021Article
- The Face of Image Reconstruction: Progress, Pitfalls, Prospects.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2020Review
- Memories replayed: reactivating past successes and new dilemmas.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The information contents of memory are the cornerstone of the most influential models in cognition. To illustrate, consider that in predictive coding, a prediction implies that specific information is propagated down from memory through the visual hierarchy. Likewise, recognizing the input implies that sequentially accrued sensory evidence is successfully matched with memorized information (categorical knowledge). Although the existing models of prediction, memory, sensory representation and categorical decision are all implicitly cast within an information processing framework, it remains a challenge to precisely specify
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.