Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32248430›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2020

Attitudes towards genetic testing and information: does parenthood shape the views?

Antti Saastamoinen, Virva Hyttinen, Mika Kortelainen, Juho Aaltio, Mari Auranen, Emil Ylikallio, Tuula Lönnqvist, Markus Sainio, Anu Suomalainen, Henna Tyynismaa and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Antti SaastamoinenFinnish Competition and Consumer Authority, Helsinki, Finland.
Virva HyttinenVATT Institute for Economic Research, PO Box 1279, 00100, Helsinki, Finland. virva.hyttinen@uef.fi.
Mika KortelainenVATT Institute for Economic Research, PO Box 1279, 00100, Helsinki, Finland.
Juho AaltioResearch Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mari AuranenResearch Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Emil YlikallioResearch Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tuula LönnqvistDepartment of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Markus SainioResearch Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anu SuomalainenResearch Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Henna TyynismaaResearch Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Pirjo IsohanniResearch Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Academy of Finland 292584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines how parents of pediatric patients might differ in their views and attitudes towards genetic technology and information when compared to adult patients. There is surprisingly little evidence on how parents compare to other parts of population in their attitudes. Previous empirical studies often relate health-related preferences and attitudes to factors such as age, education, and income instead of parental status, thus evading comparison of parents to others as health-related decision makers. Findings related to the parental status can be useful when implementing genetic technology in clinical practice. We conducted a survey of views on genetic technology and information for groups of adult neurology patients (n = 68) and parents of pediatric neurology patients (n = 31) to shed some light on this issue. In addition to our own survey instrument, we conducted other surveys to gain insight on psychosocial factors that might affect these attitudes. The results suggest that parents are more concerned about their children's genetic risk factors when compared to the attitudes of adult patients about their own risk. For both groups, negative emotional state was associated with more concerns towards genetic information. Our study provides insights on how parental views might affect the acceptance of genetic technology and information.

Indexed as

FinlandGenetic informationParental attitudesSurvey

Identifiers

PMID32248430
PMCPMC7475141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.