Observational studyUpdates in surgery2020
Pancreatic ultrasound elastography is not useful to predict the risk of pancreatic fistulas after pancreatic resection.
Observational study in Updates in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying intact and fibrotic parenchyma in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas using compression optical coherence elastography.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Shear wave elastography in healthy patients: Pancreatic stiffness is less reliable than liver and spleen measurements.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula (CR-POPF) after Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single Center Retrospective Study.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical usefulness of pancreatic elastography (PE) in the assessment of the pancreatic texture before pancreatic resection still remains uncertain. The aims are: to evaluate the value of pancreatic stiffness in both healthy volunteers and patients affected by pancreatic tumor; to evaluate the ability of PE in predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). Pancreatic stiffness of healthy subjects was compared with those of pancreatic tumors measuring shear wave velocity (SWV). In the last group, the ability of preoperative SWV in predicting CR-POPF was evaluated using linear regression. Ninety subjects were consecutively enrolled. No difference was found in SWV in the two groups (1.33 ± 0.31 vs 1.26 ± 0.30, p = 0.337). Multivariate analyses showed that male gender was associated with a softer pancreas (OR 0.74, CI 0.55-0.98, p = 0.035). In the 45 patients suitable for a secondary endpoint, the presence of soft pancreas assessed by surgeon's palpation (OR 61.21; CI 2.14- > 1000; p = 0.016) and preoperative risk score (OR 1.72; CI 1.01-2.96; p = 0.049) was predictors of CR-POPF. SWV showed a trend in predicting CR-POPF. The pancreatic stiffness far to the pancreatic neoplasm is the same as healthy controls. SWV showed a trend in predicting CR-POPF but the clinical utility is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.