ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2020
Evaluation of the impact of buffered peptone water composition on the discrimination between Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli by Raman spectroscopy.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotics promote intestinal growth of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae by enriching nutrients and depleting microbial metabolites.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Comprehensive profiling of serotypes, antimicrobial resistance and virulence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Self-Powered Flexible Sour Sensor for Detecting Ascorbic Acid Concentration Based on Triboelectrification/Enzymatic-Reaction Coupling Effect.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection of Salmonella spp. in food samples is regulated by the ISO 6579:2002 standard, which requires that precise procedures are followed to ensure the reliability of the detection process. This standard requires buffered peptone water as a rich medium for the enrichment of bacteria. However, the effects of different brands of buffered peptone water on the identification of microorganisms by Raman spectroscopy are unknown. In this regard, our study evaluated the discrimination between two bacterial species, Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli, inoculated and analyzed with six of the most commonly used buffered peptone water brands. The results showed that bacterial cells behaved differently according to the brand used in terms of biomass production and the spectral fingerprint. The identification accuracy of the analyzed strains was between 85% and 100% depending on the given brand. Several batches of two brands were studied to evaluate the classification rates between the analyzed bacterial species. The chemical analysis performed on these brands showed that the nutrient content was slightly different and probably explained the observed effects. On the basis of these results, Raman spectroscopy operators are encouraged to select an adequate culture medium and continue its use throughout the identification process to guarantee optimal recognition of the microorganism of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32248395What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.