Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32248381›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2020

Advances in diagnosis of Tuberculosis: an update into molecular diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Bodhraj Acharya, Ashma Acharya, Sanjay Gautam, Sagar Prasad Ghimire, Gokul Mishra, Navin Parajuli, Bishwa Sapkota

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 156 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
156citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

156 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Evaluating the efficacy of stool sample on Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and its comparison with other sample types by meta-analysis for TB diagnostics.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Current laboratory diagnostics for tuberculosis: from conventional approaches to next-generation molecular and immunological technologies.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The diagnostic yield of brushing versus non-brushing bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Xpert MTB/RIF in patients with suspected tuberculosis: a prospective self-controlled study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bodhraj AcharyaClinical Laboratory, Bassett Healthcare Network, Cooperstown, NY, 13226, USA.
Ashma AcharyaGeneral Welfare Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sanjay GautamSchool of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Sagar Prasad GhimireDepartment of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Government of Nepal, Teku, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Gokul MishraLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, TB IMPACT Project At Nepal National Tuberculosis Centre, Madhyapur Thimi, Nepal.
Navin ParajuliClinical Laboratory Community Memorial Hospital, Hamilton, NY, 13346, USA.
Bishwa SapkotaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA. bsapkota@ouhsc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of deaths by a single infectious agent and has now been a global public health problem due to increasing numbers of drug-resistant cases. Early and effective treatment is crucial to prevent the emergence of drug-resistance strains. This demands the availability of fast and reliable point-of-care (POC) diagnostic methods for effective case management. Commonly used methods to screen and diagnose TB are clinical, immunological, microscopy, radiography, and bacterial culture. In addition, recent advances in molecular diagnostic methods including MTBDRplus, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), line probe assay (LPA), GeneXpert, and whole genome sequencing (WGS) have been employed to diagnose and characterize TB. These methods can simultaneously identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and mutation(s) associated with routinely used anti-TB drugs. Here, we review the use of currently available diagnostic methods and strategies including conventional to recently implemented next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods used to detect MTB in clinical perspective.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycobacterium tuberculosisNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesTuberculosisTuberculosis, PulmonaryAntitubercular AgentsGeneXpertLAMPTuberculosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.