Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32248363›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2021

Combined systematic versus stand-alone multiparametric MRI-guided targeted fusion biopsy: nomogram prediction of non-organ-confined prostate cancer.

Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah, Mykyta Kachanov, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Dirk Beyersdorff, Raisa S Pompe, Su Jung Oh-Hohenhorst, Margit Fisch, Tobias Maurer, Markus Graefen, Lars Budäus

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah *Martini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. S.Bannurah@googlemail.com.
Mykyta Kachanov *Martini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Pierre I KarakiewiczCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
Dirk BeyersdorffMartini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Raisa S PompeDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Su Jung Oh-HohenhorstMartini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Margit FischDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias MaurerMartini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Markus GraefenMartini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Lars BudäusMartini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBased on unfavorable oncological and functional outcomes of non-organ-confined (NOC) prostate cancer (PCa), defined as ≥ pT3, pN1 or both, we aimed to develop a NOC prediction tool based on multiparametric MRI-guided targeted fusion biopsy (TBx). MATERIALS AND

methodsAnalyses were restricted to 594 patients with simultaneous PCa detection at systematic biopsy (SBx), TBx and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) at our institution. Development (n = 396; cohort 1) and validation cohorts (n = 198; cohort 2) were used to develop and validate the NOC nomogram. A head-to-head comparison was performed between stand-alone TBx model and combined TBx/SBx model. Second validation was performed in patients with positive TBx, but negative SBx (n = 193; cohort 3).

resultsThe most parsimonious TBx model included three independent predictors of NOC: pretreatment PSA (OR 1.05 95% CI: 1.01-1.08), highest TBx-detected Gleason pattern (3 + 3 [REF] vs. ≥ 4 + 5; OR 9.3 95% CI 3.8-22) and presence of TBx-detected perineural invasion (OR 2.2 95% CI: 1.3-3.6). The combined TBx/SBx model had the same predictors. For the stand-alone TBx and combined TBx/SBx model, external validation yielded accuracy of 76.5% (95% CI: 69.3-83.1) and 76.6% (95% CI: 69.4-83.6) within cohort 2. The external validation of the stand-alone TBx model yielded 72.4% (95% CI: 65.0-79.6) accuracy within cohort 3.

conclusionOur stand-alone TBx-based nomogram can identify PCa patients at the risk of NOC, using three simple variables, with the similar accuracy as the TBx/SBx-based model. It is non-inferior to combined TBx/SBx-based model and performs with sufficient accuracy in specific patients with positive TBx, but negative SBx.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingNomogramsAgedCohort StudiesHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsExtracapsular extensionmpMRINomogramPerineural invasionTargeted biopsy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.