ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2020
Retinal dysfunction of syphilitic outer retinopathy.
Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Putative mechanisms of ocular inflammation in syphilis.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2026Review
- Clinical features in four patients with syphilitic outer retinopathy.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe present our findings in two cases of retinal dysfunction caused by syphilitic outer retinopathy. CASE 1: A 59-year-old man visited our clinic complaining of blurred vision in his left eye. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) demonstrated an absence of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) in the left eye. A round yellowish-white lesion was observed in the posterior pole of the left fundus. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) showed hyperfluorescent areas in the posterior pole of both fundi although no specific ophthalmoscopic findings were seen in the right eye. The amplitudes of the LA 3.0 1 Hz and LA 3.0 30 Hz ERG responses were reduced with better preservation of the rod responses. Based on a strong positivity to the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) assay and the Treponema pallidum hemagglutination (TPHA) test, he was diagnosed with syphilitic outer retinopathy and treated with systemic antibiotics. The treatment resulted in a restoration of the retinal structures and cone function. CASE 2: A 47-year-old man was referred to our clinic complaining of reduced vision in both eyes. Although the ocular fundus appeared normal, FAF showed a diffuse hyperfluorescent area in the posterior pole and multiple hyperfluorescent spots. Indocyanine green angiography showed multiple confluent areas of hypofluorescence. OCT demonstrated irregular EZs in both eyes. The amplitudes of the LA 3.0 1 Hz and LA 3.0 30 Hz ERG responses were slightly reduced with prolonged implicit times. These findings are comparable to the findings in patients with multiple evanescent white dot syndrome. However, the strong positivity to the RPR and TPHA tests led us to diagnose the patient with outer retinopathy caused by syphilis. Systemic administration of antibiotics resulted in the restoration of the retinal structures and retinal function.
conclusionsSyphilitic outer retinopathy affected the retinal structures and function that can be restored by antibiotic treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.