Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32248320›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2020

Plasma exchange in acute attacks of demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system: clinical outcomes and predictors of response.

Michael A Palacios-Mendoza, María L Martínez Ginés, Pedro J Melgarejo Otálora, Juan P Cuello, Antonio Sánchez-Soblechero, Alberto Lozano Ros, José A Aparcero-Suero, Sergio López Anguita, Fernando Anaya, José M García Domínguez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael A Palacios-MendozaDepartment of Neurology, General University Hospital "Gregorio Marañon", Madrid, Spain. michaelpalmend@gmail.com.
María L Martínez GinésDepartment of Neurology, General University Hospital "Gregorio Marañon", Madrid, Spain.
Pedro J Melgarejo OtáloraDepartment of Neurology, General University Hospital "Gregorio Marañon", Madrid, Spain.
Juan P CuelloDepartment of Neurology, General University Hospital "Gregorio Marañon", Madrid, Spain.
Antonio Sánchez-SoblecheroDepartment of Neurology, General University Hospital "Gregorio Marañon", Madrid, Spain.
Alberto Lozano RosDepartment of Neurology, General University Hospital "Gregorio Marañon", Madrid, Spain.
José A Aparcero-SueroDepartment of Neurology, General University Hospital "Gregorio Marañon", Madrid, Spain.
Sergio López AnguitaDepartment of Neurology, General University Hospital "Gregorio Marañon", Madrid, Spain.
Fernando AnayaDepartment of Nephrology, General University Hospital "Gregorio Marañon", Madrid, Spain.
José M García DomínguezDepartment of Neurology, General University Hospital "Gregorio Marañon", Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlasma exchange (PLEX) is a therapeutic option in the treatment of acute attacks of Demyelinating Diseases of the Central Nervous System (DDCNS). Factors related with PLEX response are not well established.

methodsDescriptive and retrospective study. We included patients treated with PLEX for acute attacks of DDCNS between 2008 and 2017. We recorded demographics, clinical and treatment-related data, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at admission, at discharge, and at 6 months.

resultsWe included 64 patients. Forty-eight (75%) were female with a mean age of 48.28 ± 11.5 years. Half of our patients were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Clinical improvement was achieved in 51.6% at discharge and 62.5% at 6 months. The logistic regression model showed that EDSS score > 3 at admission (p = 0.04) and early clinical improvement with PLEX (p = 0.00) were predictors of good response to PLEX at discharge and at 6 months, respectively. No serious adverse effects were identified.

conclusionsPLEX is a safe and effective treatment for acute attacks of DDCNS. EDSS score at admission and early clinical improvement with PLEX were factors associated with good response to PLEX.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisNeuromyelitis OpticaAdultCentral Nervous SystemFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlasma ExchangeRetrospective StudiesDemyelinating diseasesPlasma exchangePrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.