ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2021
Open-Source Automatic Segmentation of Ocular Structures and Biomarkers of Microbial Keratitis on Slit-Lamp Photography Images Using Deep Learning.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04420962 (Quantifying Microbial Keratitis to Predict Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Quantifying Microbial Keratitis to Predict Outcomes
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Deep Learning Imaging Algorithm Measures of Microbial Keratitis With Vision Outcomes.Cornea · 2026Article
- Article
- Self-knowledge distillation-empowered directional connectivity transformer for microbial keratitis biomarkers segmentation on slit-lamp photography.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: Glaucoma, Cornea, and Oculoplastics.Cureus · 2024Review
- Establishment of a corneal ulcer prognostic model based on machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Factors Associated With Laboratory Test Negativity Following a Transition in Specimen Collection in Microbial Keratitis Cases.Current eye research · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Infectious Keratitis: Where Are We Now?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Anterior Segment Diseases: A Review of Potential Developments and Clinical Applications.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Review
- Guidelines for the application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of anterior segment diseases (2023).International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis of ocular surface diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- The Need for Artificial Intelligence Based Risk Factor Analysis for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Automated Detection of Corneal Ulcer Using Combination Image Processing and Deep Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence and corneal diseases.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2022Review
- Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Network for Accurate Corneal Segmentation in Early Detection of Fungal Keratitis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Open-Source Automatic Biomarker Measurement on Slit-Lamp Photography to Estimate Visual Acuity in Microbial Keratitis.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Preventing corneal blindness caused by keratitis using artificial intelligence.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Applications of Computer Vision for Infectious Keratitis: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmology scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose a fully-automatic deep learning-based algorithm for segmentation of ocular structures and microbial keratitis (MK) biomarkers on slit-lamp photography (SLP) images. The dataset consisted of SLP images from 133 eyes with manual annotations by a physician, P1. A modified region-based convolutional neural network, SLIT-Net, was developed and trained using P1's annotations to identify and segment four pathological regions of interest (ROIs) on diffuse white light images (stromal infiltrate (SI), hypopyon, white blood cell (WBC) border, corneal edema border), one pathological ROI on diffuse blue light images (epithelial defect (ED)), and two non-pathological ROIs on all images (corneal limbus, light reflexes). To assess inter-reader variability, 75 eyes were manually annotated for pathological ROIs by a second physician, P2. Performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). Using seven-fold cross-validation, the DSC of the algorithm (as compared to P1) for all ROIs was good (range: 0.62-0.95) on all 133 eyes. For the subset of 75 eyes with manual annotations by P2, the DSC for pathological ROIs ranged from 0.69-0.85 (SLIT-Net) vs. 0.37-0.92 (P2). DSCs for SLIT-Net were not significantly different than P2 for segmenting hypopyons (p > 0.05) and higher than P2 for WBCs (p < 0.001) and edema (p < 0.001). DSCs were higher for P2 for segmenting SIs (p < 0.001) and EDs (p < 0.001). HDs were lower for P2 for segmenting SIs (p = 0.005) and EDs (p < 0.001) and not significantly different for hypopyons (p > 0.05), WBCs (p > 0.05), and edema (p > 0.05). This prototype fully-automatic algorithm to segment MK biomarkers on SLP images performed to expectations on an exploratory dataset and holds promise for quantification of corneal physiology and pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.