Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32247987›Full record

ReviewOral oncology2020

Deintensification of treatment for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer: Current state and future directions.

Elaine O Bigelow, Tanguy Y Seiwert, Carole Fakhry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oral oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The changing face of head and neck cancer: are patients with human papillomavirus-positive disease at greater nutritional risk? A systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of head and neck cancer (2020).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The accuracy of clinical neck staging for p16-positive and negative oropharyngeal cancer and its therapeutic implications.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  13. Recommendations for the use of biomarkers for head and neck cancer, including salivary gland tumours: a consensus of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elaine O BigelowDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Tanguy Y SeiwertDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Carole FakhryDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: cfakhry@jhmi.edu.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN OTOLARYNGOLOGYT32DC000027 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAREY, JOHN PATRICK · 1989 to 2023
$5.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC) has emerged as a distinct clinical entity of head and neck cancer with expected high survival. This recognition has led to the investigation of whether a population of patients can be identified who can safely undergo treatment de-escalation, in an effort to minimize long-term treatment toxicity while maintaining excellent survival. The purpose of this review is to describe the rationale for treatment deintensification for HPV-related OPSCC, summarize available results from published clinical trials, explore the methods by which risk groups are assigned, and provide context for the multitude of clinical trials that are currently underway.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMaleOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisDe-escalationDeintensificationHuman papillomavirusOropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomaReviewTreatment

Identifiers

PMID32247987
PMCPMC8035753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.