Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32246738›Full record

ArticlePest management science2020

Deep learning for automated detection of Drosophila suzukii: potential for UAV-based monitoring.

Peter Pj Roosjen, Benjamin Kellenberger, Lammert Kooistra, David R Green, Johannes Fahrentrapp

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Mass TrappingInsects · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter Pj RoosjenLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6029-1047
Benjamin KellenbergerLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Lammert KooistraLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
David R GreenUAV/UAS Centre for Environmental Monitoring and Mapping, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Johannes FahrentrappInstitute of Natural Resource Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Wageningen University & Research · NLUniversity of Aberdeen · GBZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CH

Funding

Department for Environment, Food and Rural AffairsNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek ALW.FACCE.7Swiss Federal Office of Agriculture 627000782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe fruit fly Drosophila suzukii, or spotted wing drosophila (SWD), is a serious pest worldwide, attacking many soft-skinned fruits. An efficient monitoring system that identifies and counts SWD in crops and their surroundings is therefore essential for integrated pest management (IPM) strategies. Existing methods, such as catching flies in liquid bait traps and counting them manually, are costly, time-consuming and labour-intensive. To overcome these limitations, we studied insect trap monitoring using image-based object detection with deep learning.

resultsBased on an image database with 4753 annotated SWD flies, we trained a ResNet-18-based deep convolutional neural network to detect and count SWD, including sex prediction and discrimination. The results show that SWD can be detected with an area under the precision recall curve (AUC) of 0.506 (female) and 0.603 (male) in digital images taken from a static position. For images collected using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), the algorithm detected SWD individuals with an AUC of 0.086 (female) and 0.284 (male). The lower AUC for the aerial imagery was due to lower image quality caused by stabilisation manoeuvres of the UAV during image collection.

conclusionOur results indicate that it is possible to monitor SWD using deep learning and object detection. Moreover, the results demonstrate the potential of UAVs to monitor insect traps, which could be valuable in the development of autonomous insect monitoring systems and IPM. © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrosophilaAnimalsCrops, AgriculturalFemaleFruitHumansInsect ControlMaledeep learningDrosophila suzukiiintegrated pest management (IPM)object detectionunmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)

Identifiers

PMID32246738
PMCPMC7496713
OpenAlexW3014580981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.