ArticleNeural regeneration research2020
Differences in clinical and genetic characteristics between early- and late-onset narcolepsy in a Han Chinese cohort.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Narcolepsy: immunity, neural circuitry, and brain network reconfiguration.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The Changed Nocturnal Sleep Structure and Higher Anxiety, Depression, and Fatigue in Patients with Narcolepsy Type 1.Nature and science of sleep · 2024Article
- Exploring shared biomarkers and shared pathways in insomnia and atherosclerosis using integrated bioinformatics analysis.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024Article
- Early- and late-onset narcolepsy: possibly two distinct clinical phenotypes.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early- and late-onset narcolepsy constitutes two distinct diagnostic subgroups. However, it is not clear whether symptomology and genetic risk factors differ between early- and late-onset narcoleptics. This study compared clinical data and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between early- and late-onset patients in a large cohort of 899 Han Chinese narcolepsy patients. Blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and clinical data were prospectively collected from patients, and patients were genotyped for 40 previously reported narcolepsy risk-conferring SNPs. Genetic risk scores (GRSs), associations of five different sets of SNPs (GRS1-GRS5) with early- and late-onset narcolepsy, were evaluated using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves. Mean sleep latency was significantly shorter in early-onset cases than in late-onset cases. Symptom severity was greater among late-onset patients, with higher rates of sleep paralysis, hypnagogic hallucinations, health-related quality of life impairment, and concurrent presentation with four or more symptoms. Hypocretin levels did not differ significantly between early- and late-onset cases. Only rs3181077 (CCR1/CCR3) and rs9274477 (HLA-DQB1) were more prevalent among early-onset cases. Only GRS1 (26 SNPs; OR = 1.513, 95% CI: 0.893-2.585; P < 0.05) and GRS5 (6 SNPs; OR = 1.893, 95% CI: 1.204-2.993; P < 0.05) were associated with early-onset narcolepsy, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.731 and 0.732, respectively. Neither GRS1 nor GRS5 included SNPs in HLA regions. Our results indicate that symptomology and genetic risk factors differ between early- and late-onset narcolepsy. This protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) Panels on Medical Human Subjects at Peking University People's Hospital, China (approval No. Yuanlunshenlinyi 86) in October 2011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.