Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32246539›Full record

ReviewStatistics in medicine2020

STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 1-Basic theory and simple methods of adjustment.

Ruth H Keogh, Pamela A Shaw, Paul Gustafson, Raymond J Carroll, Veronika Deffner, Kevin W Dodd, Helmut Küchenhoff, Janet A Tooze, Michael P Wallace, Victor Kipnis and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Statistics in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-Term Recall Error in Retrospective Family Surveys: Cohabitation Histories in Denmark.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ruth H KeoghDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6504-3253
Pamela A ShawDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1883-8410
Paul GustafsonDepartment of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2375-5006
Raymond J CarrollDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Veronika DeffnerStatistical Consulting Unit StaBLab, Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Kevin W DoddBiometry Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Helmut KüchenhoffDepartment of Statistics, Statistical Consulting Unit StaBLab, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Janet A ToozeDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Michael P WallaceDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Victor KipnisBiometry Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Laurence S FreedmanBiostatistics and Biomathematics Unit, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Tel Hashomer, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-7900

Funding

Tumor Tissue CoreP30CA012197 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ruben A. Mesa · 1985 to 2026
$55.4M
Statistical methods and designs for correlated outcome and covariate errors in studies of HIV/AIDSR37AI131771 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Pamela A Shaw, Bryan Earl Shepherd · 2023 to 2026
$3.4M
Statistical methods for correlated outcome and covariate errors in studies of HIV/AIDSR01AI131771 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHAW, PAMELA A, SHEPHERD, BRYAN EARL · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
Measurement Error, Nutrition, Physical Activity and CancerU01CA057030 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI CARROLL, RAYMOND J. · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
Medical Research Council MR/M014827/1Medical Research Council MR/S017968/1NCI NIH HHS P30 CA012197NCI NIH HHS U01 CA057030NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI131771NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI131771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurement error and misclassification of variables frequently occur in epidemiology and involve variables important to public health. Their presence can impact strongly on results of statistical analyses involving such variables. However, investigators commonly fail to pay attention to biases resulting from such mismeasurement. We provide, in two parts, an overview of the types of error that occur, their impacts on analytic results, and statistical methods to mitigate the biases that they cause. In this first part, we review different types of measurement error and misclassification, emphasizing the classical, linear, and Berkson models, and on the concepts of nondifferential and differential error. We describe the impacts of these types of error in covariates and in outcome variables on various analyses, including estimation and testing in regression models and estimating distributions. We outline types of ancillary studies required to provide information about such errors and discuss the implications of covariate measurement error for study design. Methods for ascertaining sample size requirements are outlined, both for ancillary studies designed to provide information about measurement error and for main studies where the exposure of interest is measured with error. We describe two of the simpler methods, regression calibration and simulation extrapolation (SIMEX), that adjust for bias in regression coefficients caused by measurement error in continuous covariates, and illustrate their use through examples drawn from the Observing Protein and Energy (OPEN) dietary validation study. Finally, we review software available for implementing these methods. The second part of the article deals with more advanced topics.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalResearch DesignBiasCalibrationCausalityComputer SimulationHumansBerkson errorclassical errordifferential errormeasurement errormisclassificationnondifferential errorregression calibrationsample sizeSIMEXsimulation extrapolation

Identifiers

PMID32246539
PMCPMC7450672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.