Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32246399›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2020

Comparative Tolerability of Dopamine D2/3 Receptor Partial Agonists for Schizophrenia.

Nicholas Keks, Judith Hope, Darren Schwartz, Harold McLennan, David Copolov, Graham Meadows

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cariprazine on Psychosis: Beyond Schizophrenia - A Case Series.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas KeksCentre for Mental Health Education and Research, Delmont Private Hospital, Glen Iris, VIC, Australia. nicholas.keks@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5981-3706
Judith HopeCentre for Mental Health Education and Research, Delmont Private Hospital, Glen Iris, VIC, Australia.
Darren SchwartzNorth Metropolitan Health Service Mental Health, Perth, WA, Australia.
Harold McLennanEastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.
David CopolovMonash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Graham MeadowsMonash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Eastern Health · AUMonash Health · AUMonash University · AUNorth Metropolitan Health Service · AUSt Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aripiprazole, brexpiprazole and cariprazine differ from all other second-generation antipsychotics due to partial agonism at the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. In contrast to aripiprazole, brexpiprazole has lower intrinsic dopamine D2 activity and higher affinity for the serotonin 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors, while cariprazine has the highest affinity for the dopamine D3 receptor, and the longest half-life. The main adverse effect of dopamine receptor partial agonists (DRPAs) is akathisia of low-to-moderate severity, which occurs in a small proportion of patients, usually in the first few weeks of treatment. While definitive conclusions concerning differences between the DRPAs require head-to-head comparison studies, on the available evidence, akathisia is probably least likely to occur with brexpiprazole and most likely with cariprazine; the risk of akathisia with aripiprazole lies in between. Weight-gain risk is low with aripiprazole and cariprazine, but moderate with brexpiprazole. Risk of sedation is low with DRPAs, as is risk of insomnia and nausea. Partial dopamine agonism leads to a low risk for hyperprolactinaemia (and probably a low risk of sexual dysfunction). Prolactin concentrations fall in some patients (particularly those with elevated levels prior to initiating the drugs). Rates of discontinuation due to adverse effects in pivotal studies were low, and on the whole, DRPAs are well tolerated. Aripiprazole has been implicated in pathological gambling and other impulse control behaviours, likely due to partial dopamine agonist activity (there have been no reports with brexpiprazole and cariprazine). The risks for diabetes and tardive dyskinesia with DRPAs are unknown, but are likely to be low. On the basis of tolerability, DRPAs should be considered as first-line treatment options, particularly in patients with early schizophrenia.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazoleDopamine AgonistsHumansPiperazinesQuinolonesReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D3SchizophreniaThiophenesAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazolebrexpiprazolecariprazineDopamine AgonistsDRD2 protein, humanDRD3 protein, humanPiperazinesQuinolonesReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D3Thiophenes

Identifiers

PMID32246399
OpenAlexW3014602173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.