ReviewThe AAPS journal2020
Clinical Immunogenicity Risk Assessment for a Fusion Protein.
Review in The AAPS journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- IQ Survey Results on Current Industry Practices-Part 1: Immunogenicity Risk Assessment.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- Immunogenicity risk assessment for tailored mitigation and monitoring of biotherapeutics during development: recommendations from the European Immunogenicity Platform.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Fusion Proteins.The AAPS journal · 2023Review
- The AAPS Journal Theme Issue: Compendium of Immunogenicity Risk Assessments: an Industry Guidance Built on Experience and Published Work.The AAPS journal · 2023Article
- Alternative oxidase encoded by sequence-optimized and chemically-modified RNA transfected into mammalian cells is catalytically active.Gene therapy · 2022Article
- Analysis of the Immunogenicity from Abatacept-Treated Pediatric Patients With Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Findings From Two Phase III Clinical Trials.ACR open rheumatology · 2022Article
- Pharmaceutical strategies to extend pulmonary exposure of inhaled medicines.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2021Review
- Bioanalysis in the Age of New Drug Modalities.The AAPS journal · 2021Review
- Trastuzumab immunogenicity development in patients' sera and in laboratory animals.BMC immunology · 2021Article
- Redefining the Role of Lymphotoxin Beta Receptor in the Maintenance of Lymphoid Organs and Immune Cell Homeostasis in Adulthood.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Site-Specific Lipidation of a Small-Sized Protein Binder Enhances the Antitumor Activity through Extended Blood Half-Life.ACS omega · 2020Article
- Addressing challenging impurities in fusion proteins: A comprehensive review and cost-effective strategy for HCP and low molecular weight species control.Biotechnology progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This document highlights some relevant factors in the assessment of immunogenicity risk of fusion protein therapeutics. Our aim is to highlight specific risks associated with this type of molecule, while also aligning with general risk assessment factors, through a hypothetical case study, where the therapeutic molecule of interest is a Receptor-Fc Fusion protein (RFF) expressed within a typical manufacturing process in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells (CHO). Given that the components are comprised of endogenous sequences, the risk of developing an ADA response to this molecule is generally considered to be low. However, the consequences of such an immune response may be more severe, specifically, if there is cross reactivity with the endogenous receptor, inducing cell lysis, or if any ADA act as an agonist to trigger receptor signaling. The risk factors described below are not meant to provide a comprehensive list, but rather a framework for factors that should be considered. Immunogenicity risk is difficult to quantify and relies on a comprehensive analysis of both product and patient-related factors. The goal is not necessarily to quantify risk, but rather to demonstrate an understanding of factors that may pose a risk, implement a strategy to minimize risk factors and then align overall risk with a bioanalytical immunogenicity monitoring strategy. The consequences resulting from unexpected outcome will likely depend on severity and impact on patient safety. An immunogenicity risk assessment is an ongoing and continuous process throughout clinical development with the goal of maximizing the safety of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.