Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32246275›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2021

Differential utility of teacher and parent-teacher combined information in the assessment of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder symptoms.

Alexandra Garcia-Rosales, Silia Vitoratou, Stephen V Faraone, Daniel Rudaizky, Tobias Banaschewski, Philip Asherson, Edmund Sonuga-Barke, Jan Buitelaar, Robert D Oades, Aribert Rothenberger and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alexandra Garcia-Rosales *MRC Social Genetic Developmental and Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neurosciences, King's College London, London, UK. rosales.garcia@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3377-5369
Silia Vitoratou *Psychometrics and Measurement Lab, Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neurosciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1209-8167
Stephen V FaraoneDepartments of Psychiatry and of Neuroscience and Physiology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Daniel RudaizkyCentre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9510-7382
Tobias BanaschewskiDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4595-1144
Philip AshersonMRC Social Genetic Developmental and Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neurosciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Edmund Sonuga-BarkeMRC Social Genetic Developmental and Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neurosciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6996-3935
Jan BuitelaarDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Robert D OadesClinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6151-5559
Aribert RothenbergerClinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2367-9197
Hans-Christoph SteinhausenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6400-4436
Eric TaylorMRC Social Genetic Developmental and Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neurosciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6081-1698
Wai ChenComplex Attention and Hyperactivity Disorders Service (CAHDS), Child and Adolescent Health Service (CAHS), Department of Health Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0477-7883

Funding

International Multi-Center ADHD Genetics ProjectR01MH062873 · NIMH · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI FARAONE, STEPHEN V · 2002 to 2007
$7.2M
Analysis of an ADHD Whole Genome Association ScanR01MH081803 · NIMH · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI FARAONE, STEPHEN V · 2007 to 2007
$157k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH062873NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH081803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsistent research findings indicate that parents and teachers observe genuinely different Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) behaviours in their respective settings.

objectiveTo evaluate the utility of information provided by teacher informant assessments (INFAs) of ADHD symptoms, and the implications of aggregation algorithms in combing parents' information, i.e. using 'or-rule' (endorsement by either one informant) versus 'and-rule' (endorsement by both informants).

methodTeacher ratings on Conners scales and clinical data from parental accounts on 1383 probands and their siblings from the IMAGE study were analysed. The psychometric properties of teacher and combined ratings using the item response theory model (IRT) are presented. Kappa coefficients, intraclass correlations and linear regression were employed.

resultsFirst, teacher endorsement of symptoms is located in a narrow part of the trait continuum close to the average levels. Symptoms exhibit comparable perception in the measurement of the trait(s) with similar discrimination ability and information (reliability). Second, the IRT properties of the 'or-rule' ratings are predominantly influenced by parent-INFAs; and the 'and-rule' ratings predominantly by teacher-INFAs ratings. Third, parent-teacher INFAs agreement was low, both for individual items (κ = 0.01-0.15) and for dimensional scores (r = 0.12-0.16). The 'or-rule' captured milder expressions of ADHD symptoms, whereas the 'and-rule' indexed greater severity of ADHD.

conclusionsParent and teacher-INFAs provide different kinds of information, while both are useful. Teacher-INFA and the 'and-rule' provide a more accurate index of severity than an additive symptom count. Parent-INFA and the 'or-rule' are more sensitive for detecting cases with milder ADHD.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityFemaleHumansMaleParentsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSchool TeachersADHD DSM-IV criteriaCasenessDiagnostic overshadowingIRTParent/teacher

Identifiers

PMID32246275
PMCPMC7864845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.