ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2021
Temporal integration in the perception and discrimination of solid shape.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aging and temporal integration in the visual perception of object shape.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two experiments evaluated the importance of temporal integration for the perception and discrimination of solid object shape. In Experiment 1, observers anorthoscopically viewed moving or stationary cast shadows of naturally shaped solid objects (bell peppers, Capsicum annuum) through narrow (4-mm wide) slits. At any given moment, observers could only see a very small portion of the overall object shape (generally less than 10%). The results showed that the observers' discrimination performance for the moving cast shadows was much higher than that obtained for the stationary shadows, demonstrating the ability to temporally integrate the piecemeal momentary information about shape that was available through the narrow apertures. In a second experiment, estimates of the strength of the observers' impressions of solid shapes rotating in depth were obtained as well as discrimination accuracies; perceptions of the original moving condition were compared with a new condition where the frames of the apparent motion sequences depicting solid objects in continuous motion (behind the slits) were randomly scrambled. The observers perceived the anorthoscopic displays as depicting solid objects rotating in depth, but only in the continuous motion condition. Interestingly, the discrimination performance in the scrambled condition remained relatively high-observers were still able to integrate information across the multiple scrambled frames in order to produce discrimination performance that was significantly higher than that obtained in the stationary shadow condition. This study was the first to thoroughly evaluate whether and to what extent human observers can effectively discriminate and perceive solid object shape anorthoscopically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32246265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.