ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2020
How long is long enough? Good neurologic outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors despite prolonged resuscitation: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Development of a health equity tool in resuscitation sciences and application to current research in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2025Review
- Exercise related versus non exercise related out of hospital cardiac arrest - A retrospective single-center study.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite all efforts, mortality of out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains high. Patients with OHCA due to a primary shockable rhythm typically have a better prognosis. However, outcome worsens if return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) cannot be achieved quickly. There is insufficient evidence for maximum duration of resuscitation in these patients and it is unclear, which patients profit from transport under ongoing CPR.
objectiveInvestigate predictors for favourable neurologic outcome in OHCA patients with presumed cardiac cause due to refractory shockable rhythm (rSR).
methodsRetrospective analysis of OHCA patients that presented to a tertiary hospital due to a rSR.
resultsOne hundred seventy-five OHCA patients with presumed cardiac cause due to rSR were included. Overall hospital mortality was 50% and 83% of initial survivors were discharged with a good neurologic outcome [cerebral performance category (CPC) 1-2]. In patients with a time from cardiac arrest to ROSC of > 45 min, 18% survived to CPC 1-2. Independent predictors for good neurologic outcome were age, lower no-flow time and lower serum lactate levels at hospital arrival.
conclusionIn an urban setting, a significant proportion of OHCA patients with rSR can survive to a good neurologic outcome, despite very long time to ROSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32246250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.