Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32246231›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Percutaneous vertebroplasty as treatment of malignant vertebral lesions: a systematic review and GRADE evaluation resulting in a Danish national clinical guideline.

Rikke Rousing, Andreas Ole Kirkegaard, Michael Nielsen, Eva Holtved, Leif Hougaard Sørensen, Thomas Lund, Viola Olesen, Mikkel Ø Andersen

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rikke RousingCenter for Spine Surgery and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Oestre Hougvej 55, 5500, Middelfart, Denmark. rikke.rousing@rsyd.dk.
Andreas Ole KirkegaardCenter for Spine Surgery and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Oestre Hougvej 55, 5500, Middelfart, Denmark.
Michael NielsenCapio CFR, Hans Bekkevolds Allé 2B, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Eva HoltvedDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Leif Hougaard SørensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Thomas LundDepartment of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Viola OlesenSpine Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, København Ø, Denmark.
Mikkel Ø AndersenCenter for Spine Surgery and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Oestre Hougvej 55, 5500, Middelfart, Denmark.
Lillebaelt Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo summarize the recommendations from the national clinical guideline published by the Danish Health Authority, regarding cemental augmentation as treatment for painful vertebral lesions, in patients with malignant disease.

methodsA multidisciplinary working group formulated recommendations based on the GRADE approach.

resultsTwo of the questions were based on randomized studies and one on professional consensus. The guideline recommends cemental augmentation for painful vertebral lesions in patients with malignant diagnosis, either hematological or non-hematological. Fracture of the posterior wall is not a contradiction to cemental augmentation, but care should always be taken while injecting the cement, to decrease the risk of cemental leaks into the spinal canal.

conclusionThe recommendations are based on low-to-moderate quality of evidence or professional consensus as well as patient preferences and positive and harmful effects of the intervention. The working group recommends more randomized studies on patients with different malignant diseases and painful vertebral lesions comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty and conservative treatment to confirm the conclusion in this guideline. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Fractures, CompressionKyphoplastySpinal FracturesVertebroplastyBone CementsDenmarkHumansOsteoporotic FracturesTreatment OutcomeBone CementsClinical guidelineKyphoplastyMalignant diseasePainful vertebral lesionsPercutaneous vertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID32246231
OpenAlexW3014963586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.