Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32246217›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2020

Gender-specific differences in care-seeking behaviour among lung cancer patients: a systematic review.

Rezwanul Hasan Rana, Fariha Alam, Khorshed Alam, Jeff Gow

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Sex-based inequities in non-small cell lung cancer: gaps and opportunities across the care pathway.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. The role of socioeconomic position in use of systemic anticancer therapy.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Evaluation of sex inequity in lung-cancer-specific survival.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rezwanul Hasan RanaSchool of Commerce, University of Southern Queensland, West Street, Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, Australia. rezwanul_54@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3347-3205
Fariha AlamPrince of Wales Hospital, NSW Health, Sydney, NSW, 2301, Australia.
Khorshed AlamSchool of Commerce, University of Southern Queensland, West Street, Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2232-0745
Jeff GowSchool of Commerce, University of Southern Queensland, West Street, Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5726-298X
University of Southern Queensland · AUToowoomba Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the literature, men are often described as unwilling to use healthcare services, whereas women as frequent users. We conducted a systematic literature review to examine the gender differences in healthcare utilisation of lung cancer patients. Our aim was to synthesise evidence to assess whether men and women utilise cancer diagnosis and treatments differently.

methodsThe databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO Host, Ovid nursing, and Cochrane was systematically searched. We used pre-defined eligibility criteria to identify peer-reviewed published literature that reported healthcare use of lung cancer patients. Two reviewers independently screened the title, abstract, full texts and retrieved relevant data.

resultsA total of 42 studies met the eligibility criteria from 1356 potential studies. In these studies, the most commonly measured healthcare utilisation is surgery (n = 19), followed by chemotherapy (n = 13). All the studies were from developed countries and had a higher percentage of male participants. Substantial evidence of heterogeneity in the use of treatments by gender were found. In relation to diagnosis interval and stage of cancer diagnosis, it was found that women had longer diagnostic intervals. Nonetheless, women tend to get diagnosed at an earlier stage. Furthermore, women had a higher probability of using inpatient cancer-care services and surgical treatments. Conversely, men had greater risks of readmission after surgery and longer length of stay. Lastly, there were no significant gender differences in the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

conclusionThis study synthesised evidence of disparities in the use of lung cancer treatments based on gender in developed countries, with no evidence available from least-developed and developing countries. Further studies are required to understand this gender-specific inequality and to design interventions to improve the survival rate of lung cancer patients.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareSex FactorsEmergency department presentationGender differenceHealthcare utilisationLung cancerSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32246217
PMCPMC11804639
OpenAlexW3014493345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.