ArticleExperimental brain research2020
Motor and spatial representations of action: corticospinal excitability in M1 after training with a bimanual skill.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bimanual coordination and neuromuscular synchronization in Parkinson's disease and healthy adults.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Application of bilateral tDCS over left and right M1 produces asymmetric training and retention effects when learning a rhythmic bimanual task.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Exploring motor skill acquisition in bimanual coordination: insights from navigating a novel maze task.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the study was twofold: (1) determine if different time delays (30 min or 6 h) between training and a post-training test with a rhythmic bimanual pattern (90° relative phase) would be associated with different levels of consolidation for the motor and spatial representations of the pattern; and (2) determine if training with the rhythmic bimanual pattern would lead to enhanced corticospinal excitability in M1 linked to changes in motor and spatial performance measures. Coordination accuracy and stability of the 90° pattern improved over practice. Coordination accuracy and stability were the same after a 30-min or 6-h delay between training and the post-training test, indicating equivalent levels of consolidation in the motor representation. The 6-h delay interval resulted in shorter visual recognition times compared to the 30-min delay and was centered on the trained 90° pattern. These findings indicate the consolidation of the spatial representation was more time sensitive compared to the motor representation in the current task. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) generated by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were measured at baseline (before training) and at 6-min and 21-min intervals post-training with the 90° pattern. Increased corticospinal excitability in M1 was evidenced by larger MEPs of the FDI muscle at the 6-min interval. This increased excitability after training is a novel finding after training with a difficult and initially unstable rhythmic bimanual pattern. No significant correlations were found between the MEP data and behavioral data; thus, the increased excitability in M1 may have been linked to the difficulty in performing the pattern, consolidation processes, or both.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.