ArticleScientific reports2020
3D Printing of Inertial Microfluidic Devices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 209 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- 3D-Printed Closed-Channel Spiral Inertial Microfluidic Device for Size-Based Particle Separation.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Flow efficiency of 3D-printed refeeding tubes in a simulated neonatal high-output stoma model.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Advancement in continuous lactate determination in untreated human serum: multipolymer-based amperometric biosensor coupled with a low-cost 3D-printed microfluidic cell.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- Boosting New Electrochemical Reactor Designs to Improve the Performance in HACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2025Article
- Microfluidics-assisted Tumor Cell Separation Approaches for Clinical Applications: An Overview on Emerging Devices.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025Review
- Multipath Projection Stereolithography for Three-Dimensional Printing Microfluidic Devices.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Ferrimagnetic Tb/Co multilayers patterned by ion bombardment as substrates for magnetophoresis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Lab-on-Chip Systems for Cell Sorting: Main Features and Advantages of Inertial Focusing in Spiral Microchannels.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Nested Biofabrication: Matryoshka-Inspired Intra-Embedded Bioprinting.Small methods · 2024Article
- Advantages of stereolithographic 3D printing in the fabrication of the Affiblot device for dot-blot assays.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Article
- A smartphone serves as a data logger for a fully automated lab-constructed microfluidic system.MethodsX · 2024Article
- Review
- Impact of Beam Shape on Print Accuracy in Digital Light Processing Additive Manufacture.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024Article
- Fabrication of a Microfluidic Test Device with a 3D Printer and Its Combination with the Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method to DetectMicromachines · 2024Article
- Advancing 3D printed microfluidics with computational methods for sweat analysis.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Review
- An Exploration of Organoid Technology: Present Advancements, Applications, and Obstacles.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2024Review
- A review on inertial microfluidic fabrication methods.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Review
- Recent Progress in Printed Photonic Devices: A Brief Review of Materials, Devices, and Applications.Polymers · 2023Review
- Recent Developments in Inertial and Centrifugal Microfluidic Systems along with the Involved Forces for Cancer Cell Separation: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inertial microfluidics has been broadly investigated, resulting in the development of various applications, mainly for particle or cell separation. Lateral migrations of these particles within a microchannel strictly depend on the channel design and its cross-section. Nonetheless, the fabrication of these microchannels is a continuous challenging issue for the microfluidic community, where the most studied channel cross-sections are limited to only rectangular and more recently trapezoidal microchannels. As a result, a huge amount of potential remains intact for other geometries with cross-sections difficult to fabricate with standard microfabrication techniques. In this study, by leveraging on benefits of additive manufacturing, we have proposed a new method for the fabrication of inertial microfluidic devices. In our proposed workflow, parts are first printed via a high-resolution DLP/SLA 3D printer and then bonded to a transparent PMMA sheet using a double-coated pressure-sensitive adhesive tape. Using this method, we have fabricated and tested a plethora of existing inertial microfluidic devices, whether in a single or multiplexed manner, such as straight, spiral, serpentine, curvilinear, and contraction-expansion arrays. Our characterizations using both particles and cells revealed that the produced chips could withstand a pressure up to 150 psi with minimum interference of the tape to the total functionality of the device and viability of cells. As a showcase of the versatility of our method, we have proposed a new spiral microchannel with right-angled triangular cross-section which is technically impossible to fabricate using the standard lithography. We are of the opinion that the method proposed in this study will open the door for more complex geometries with the bespoke passive internal flow. Furthermore, the proposed fabrication workflow can be adopted at the production level, enabling large-scale manufacturing of inertial microfluidic devices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.